PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 5 228V

2024

Why buy it

✅+4.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Costs $34 less on MSRP ($295 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Delivers 11.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 57.5 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($295 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Draws 17W instead of 105W, a 88W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Prism), unlike Core Ultra 5 228V.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 9,932).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.5 vs 57.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $295 MSRP).
❌517.6% higher power demand at 105W vs 17W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 228V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 228V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core Ultra 5 228V

2024

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

2018

Why buy it

✅+4.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Costs $34 less on MSRP ($295 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Delivers 11.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 57.5 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($295 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Draws 17W instead of 105W, a 88W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Prism), unlike Core Ultra 5 228V.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 9,932).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.5 vs 57.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $295 MSRP).
❌517.6% higher power demand at 105W vs 17W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 228V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 228V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 228V better than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is ahead with a 11.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 228V pulls ahead with 4.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 228V is the better fit. You are getting 4.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 5 228V is the smarter buy today. Core Ultra 5 228V is $34 cheaper on MSRP at $295 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it gives you 4.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The trade-off is that Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 11.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 11.5% better value on MSRP (57.5 vs 51.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 228V is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2018), a healthier platform with FCBGA2833 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core Ultra 5 228V Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core Ultra 5 228V	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
1080p
low	180 FPS	223 FPS
medium	145 FPS	191 FPS
high	117 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	97 FPS	113 FPS
1440p
low	148 FPS	183 FPS
medium	117 FPS	150 FPS
high	95 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	85 FPS
4K
low	83 FPS	71 FPS
medium	71 FPS	63 FPS
high	57 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	38 FPS

Open Core Ultra 5 228V Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core Ultra 5 228V	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
1080p
low	212 FPS	346 FPS
medium	176 FPS	305 FPS
high	158 FPS	270 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	240 FPS
1440p
low	181 FPS	316 FPS
medium	154 FPS	285 FPS
high	142 FPS	250 FPS
ultra	122 FPS	218 FPS
4K
low	137 FPS	232 FPS
medium	122 FPS	213 FPS
high	115 FPS	195 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	170 FPS

Open Core Ultra 5 228V Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core Ultra 5 228V	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
1080p
low	424 FPS	424 FPS
medium	424 FPS	424 FPS
high	424 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	424 FPS
1440p
low	424 FPS	424 FPS
medium	424 FPS	424 FPS
high	424 FPS	405 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	340 FPS
4K
low	424 FPS	391 FPS
medium	384 FPS	323 FPS
high	343 FPS	284 FPS
ultra	272 FPS	228 FPS

Open Core Ultra 5 228V Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core Ultra 5 228V	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
1080p
low	424 FPS	424 FPS
medium	424 FPS	424 FPS
high	424 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	424 FPS
1440p
low	424 FPS	424 FPS
medium	424 FPS	424 FPS
high	424 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	424 FPS
4K
low	424 FPS	424 FPS
medium	424 FPS	424 FPS
high	424 FPS	413 FPS
ultra	408 FPS	359 FPS

Open Core Ultra 5 228V Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 228V and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

Core Ultra 5 228V

The Core Ultra 5 228V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,955 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,959 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 228V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 228V versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X — a 9.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 228V (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 228V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 228V scores 16,955 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X's 16,959 — a 0% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 9,932 vs 9,500 (4.4% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 228V). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,585 vs 1,255, a 69.3% lead for the Core Ultra 5 228V that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,053 vs 6,243 (46.8% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 228V). L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 228V vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 228V	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+10%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.6 GHz+71%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	2.5 MB (per core)+400%	512K (per core)
Process	3 nm-75%	12 nm
Architecture	Lunar Lake (2024)	Zen+ (2018−2019)
PassMark	16,955	16,959
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,932+5%	9,500
Geekbench 6 Single	2,585+106%	1,255
Geekbench 6 Multi	10,053+61%	6,243

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 228V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5X-8533 on the Core Ultra 5 228V versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X — the Core Ultra 5 228V supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Core Ultra 5 228V) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X) — the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core Ultra 5 228V) and X470,B450,X370,B350,A320 (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X).

Feature	Core Ultra 5 228V	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
Socket	FCBGA2833	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5X-8533+25%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	128 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	8	20+150%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: Yes (Core Ultra 5 228V) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X). The Core Ultra 5 228V includes integrated graphics (Arc 130V), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X targets Workstation.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 228V	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Arc 130V	—
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	Yes	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Core Ultra 5 228V launched at $295 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X debuted at $329. On MSRP ($295 vs $329), the Core Ultra 5 228V is $34 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 228V delivers 57.5 pts/$ vs 51.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X — making the Core Ultra 5 228V the 10.9% better value option.