
Core i7-7820X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-7820X
2017Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 28.7 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 140W vs 105W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
2018Why buy it
- ✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 11 MB).
- ✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 79.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.5 vs 28.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 140W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,959 vs 17,171).
Core i7-7820X
2017Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
2018Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 11 MB).
- ✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 79.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.5 vs 28.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 140W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 28.7 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 140W vs 105W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,959 vs 17,171).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-7820X better than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-7820X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 208 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-7820X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 265 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 233 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 327 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 170 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-7820X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 429 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 429 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 429 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 429 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 429 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 429 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 429 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 429 FPS | 340 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 429 FPS | 391 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 364 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 292 FPS | 228 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-7820X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 429 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 429 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 429 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 429 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 429 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 429 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 429 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 429 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 429 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 429 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 429 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 429 FPS | 359 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-7820X and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

Core i7-7820X
Core i7-7820X
The Core i7-7820X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 17,171 points. Launch price was $599.


Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,959 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-7820X and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i7-7820X versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X — a 9.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-7820X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-7820X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7820X scores 17,171 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X's 16,959 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-7820X. L3 cache: 11 MB (total) on the Core i7-7820X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.
| Feature | Core i7-7820X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+10% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 11 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+45% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 12 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 17,171+1% | 16,959 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,255 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 6,243 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-7820X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-7820X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-7820X) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X targets Workstation.
| Feature | Core i7-7820X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-7820X launched at $599 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X debuted at $329. On MSRP ($599 vs $329), the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is $270 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-7820X delivers 28.7 pts/$ vs 51.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X — making the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X the 57.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-7820X | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $329-45% |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.7 | 51.5+79% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











