
Core i5-11500
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-11500
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $137 less on MSRP ($192 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 72.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($192 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 750, while Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
2018Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-11500 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 9,883).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.5 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-11500
2021Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $137 less on MSRP ($192 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 72.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($192 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 750, while Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-11500 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 9,883).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.5 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-11500 better than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-11500 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-11500 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 282 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 400 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 334 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 251 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 170 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-11500 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 340 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 391 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 228 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-11500 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 415 FPS | 359 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-11500 and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

Core i5-11500
Core i5-11500
The Core i5-11500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 17,096 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,959 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-11500 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-11500 versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X — a 11.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-11500 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-11500 uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11500 scores 17,096 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X's 16,959 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-11500. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 9,883 vs 9,500 (4% advantage for the Core i5-11500). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,064 vs 1,255, a 48.7% lead for the Core i5-11500 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 8,564 vs 6,243 (31.4% advantage for the Core i5-11500). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11500 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.
| Feature | Core i5-11500 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+12% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.6 GHz+33% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 12 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake (2021) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 17,096 | 16,959 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,883+4% | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,064+64% | 1,255 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,564+37% | 6,243 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-11500 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H510,B560,Z590,H470,Z490 (Core i5-11500) and X470,B450,X370,B350,A320 (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X).
| Feature | Core i5-11500 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i5-11500 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-11500) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X). The Core i5-11500 includes integrated graphics (UHD 750), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11500 targets Gaming, Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-11500 rivals Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i5-11500 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD 750 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-11500 launched at $192 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X debuted at $329. On MSRP ($192 vs $329), the Core i5-11500 is $137 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-11500 delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 51.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X — making the Core i5-11500 the 53.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-11500 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $192-42% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.0+73% | 51.5 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











