Core i7-11600H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-11600H

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

2018

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-11600H across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (15,342 vs 15,441).
❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Core i7-11600H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-11600H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-11600H

2021

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-11600H across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (15,342 vs 15,441).
❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Core i7-11600H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-11600H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-11600H better than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700?

Yes. Core i7-11600H is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 8.6% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-11600H is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 8.6% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-11600H is the better fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-11600H is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i7-11600H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it gives you a 8.6% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (51.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-11600H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2018) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-11600H Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-11600H	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
1080p
low	169 FPS	176 FPS
medium	151 FPS	154 FPS
high	125 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	105 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	144 FPS	145 FPS
medium	122 FPS	122 FPS
high	98 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	66 FPS
medium	75 FPS	59 FPS
high	60 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	37 FPS

Open Core i7-11600H Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-11600H	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
1080p
low	386 FPS	336 FPS
medium	386 FPS	297 FPS
high	330 FPS	265 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	237 FPS
1440p
low	386 FPS	307 FPS
medium	347 FPS	278 FPS
high	300 FPS	246 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	215 FPS
4K
low	272 FPS	225 FPS
medium	235 FPS	207 FPS
high	213 FPS	193 FPS
ultra	182 FPS	168 FPS

Open Core i7-11600H Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-11600H	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
1080p
low	386 FPS	384 FPS
medium	386 FPS	384 FPS
high	386 FPS	384 FPS
ultra	364 FPS	384 FPS
1440p
low	386 FPS	384 FPS
medium	386 FPS	384 FPS
high	372 FPS	384 FPS
ultra	312 FPS	337 FPS
4K
low	351 FPS	384 FPS
medium	300 FPS	319 FPS
high	255 FPS	281 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	226 FPS

Open Core i7-11600H Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-11600H	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
1080p
low	386 FPS	384 FPS
medium	386 FPS	384 FPS
high	386 FPS	384 FPS
ultra	386 FPS	384 FPS
1440p
low	386 FPS	384 FPS
medium	386 FPS	384 FPS
high	386 FPS	384 FPS
ultra	386 FPS	384 FPS
4K
low	386 FPS	384 FPS
medium	386 FPS	384 FPS
high	386 FPS	384 FPS
ultra	344 FPS	332 FPS

Open Core i7-11600H Open Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-11600H and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

Core i7-11600H

The Core i7-11600H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake H45 (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,441 points. Launch price was $395.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 15,342 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-11600H packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i7-11600H versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 — a 11.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-11600H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-11600H uses the Tiger Lake H45 (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-11600H scores 15,441 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700's 15,342 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-11600H. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i7-11600H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700.

Feature	Core i7-11600H	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+12%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.2 GHz+28%
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)+13%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512K (per core)
Process	10 nm SuperFin-17%	12 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake H45 (2021)	Zen+ (2018−2019)
PassMark	15,441	15,342
Geekbench 6 Single	1,903	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-11600H uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-11600H	Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Socket	FCBGA1787	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-11600H) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700). The Core i7-11600H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-11600H targets Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-11600H rivals Ryzen 5 5600H.