
Core i5-11400H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-11400H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 11th Gen 16EU, while Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,262 vs 15,342).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
2018Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Core i5-11400H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11400H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-11400H
2021Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 11th Gen 16EU, while Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,262 vs 15,342).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Core i5-11400H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11400H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-11400H better than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-11400H | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-11400H | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 382 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 254 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 168 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-11400H | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 382 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 382 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 382 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 382 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 382 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 378 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 325 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-11400H | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 382 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 382 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 382 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 382 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 382 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 382 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 332 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-11400H and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

Core i5-11400H
Core i5-11400H
The Core i5-11400H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,262 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 15,342 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-11400H packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-11400H versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 — a 9.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-11400H (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-11400H uses the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11400H scores 15,262 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700's 15,342 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11400H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700.
| Feature | Core i5-11400H | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+10% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.2 GHz+19% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin-17% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-H (2021) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 15,262 | 15,342 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,150 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,900 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 6,500 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-11400H uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-11400H | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1787 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-11400H) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700). The Core i5-11400H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 11th Gen 16EU), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11400H targets Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-11400H rivals Ryzen 5 5600H.
| Feature | Core i5-11400H | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 11th Gen 16EU | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












