
Core i5-11260H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-11260H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
2018Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,342 vs 15,459).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Core i5-11260H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Core i5-11260H
2021Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,342 vs 15,459).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Core i5-11260H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-11260H better than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-11260H | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-11260H | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 362 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 327 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 168 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-11260H | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 312 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-11260H | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 332 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-11260H and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

Core i5-11260H
Core i5-11260H
The Core i5-11260H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,459 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 15,342 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-11260H packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-11260H versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-11260H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-11260H uses the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11260H scores 15,459 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700's 15,342 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-11260H. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11260H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700.
| Feature | Core i5-11260H | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+7% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz+23% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin-17% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-H (2021) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 15,459 | 15,342 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-11260H uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-11260H | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1787 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












