
Core i3-14100
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i3-14100
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $165 less on MSRP ($134 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 121.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 113.5 vs 51.3 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 65W, a 5W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,213 vs 15,342).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.3 vs 113.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i3-14100 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i3-14100
2024Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $165 less on MSRP ($134 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 121.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 113.5 vs 51.3 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 65W, a 5W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,213 vs 15,342).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.3 vs 113.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i3-14100 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 better than Core i3-14100?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i3-14100 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i3-14100 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 273 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 233 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 168 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i3-14100 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 380 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 380 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 380 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 371 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i3-14100 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 380 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 380 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 380 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 332 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-14100 and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

Core i3-14100
Core i3-14100
The Core i3-14100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,213 points. Launch price was $134.


Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 15,342 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i3-14100 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i3-14100 versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 — a 13.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-14100 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i3-14100 uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-14100 scores 15,213 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700's 15,342 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i3-14100 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700.
| Feature | Core i3-14100 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+15% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+9% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-42% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 15,213 | 15,342 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-14100 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-14100 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-14100 launched at $134 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 debuted at $299. On MSRP ($134 vs $299), the Core i3-14100 is $165 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-14100 delivers 113.5 pts/$ vs 51.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 — making the Core i3-14100 the 75.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-14100 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $134-55% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 113.5+121% | 51.3 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












