
M2 Pro 10-Core
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 250
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
M2 Pro 10-Core
2023Why buy it
- β +0.7% higher PassMark.
- β +50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 250 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β350% higher power demand at 36W vs 8W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
2025Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +24.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 8W instead of 36W, a 28W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (21,789 vs 21,939).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while M2 Pro 10-Core mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
M2 Pro 10-Core
2023Ryzen 7 PRO 250
2025Why buy it
- β +0.7% higher PassMark.
- β +50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +24.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 8W instead of 36W, a 28W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 250 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β350% higher power demand at 36W vs 8W.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (21,789 vs 21,939).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while M2 Pro 10-Core mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 250 better than M2 Pro 10-Core?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | M2 Pro 10-Core | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | M2 Pro 10-Core | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 455 FPS | 492 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 314 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 260 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 388 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 376 FPS |
| high | 283 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 281 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 219 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 195 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 214 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | M2 Pro 10-Core | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 548 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 548 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 522 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 478 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 449 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 419 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 343 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | M2 Pro 10-Core | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 548 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 548 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 548 FPS | 545 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 548 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 535 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 458 FPS | 545 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 385 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of M2 Pro 10-Core and Ryzen 7 PRO 250
M2 Pro 10-Core
M2 Pro 10-Core
The M2 Pro 10-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.42 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MBΒ +Β 24 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,939 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 250
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
The Ryzen 7 PRO 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023β2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MBΒ +Β 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,789 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The M2 Pro 10-Core packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the M2 Pro 10-Core has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the M2 Pro 10-Core versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 β a 31.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 (base: 2.42 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 250 is built on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023β2025) architecture. In PassMark, the M2 Pro 10-Core scores 21,939 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 250's 21,789 β a 0.7% lead for the M2 Pro 10-Core. L3 cache: 24 MB on the M2 Pro 10-Core vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 250.
| Feature | M2 Pro 10-Core | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 10+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 5.1 GHz+38% |
| Base Clock | 2.42 GHz | 3.3 GHz+36% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB+50% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+350% | 8 MB |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | β | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023β2025) |
| PassMark | 21,939 | 21,789 |
Memory & Platform
The M2 Pro 10-Core uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | M2 Pro 10-Core | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












