PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7352

2019

Why buy it

✅+37.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 9800X3D across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.9 vs 83.4 PassMark/$ ($1,350 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
❌29.2% higher power demand at 155W vs 120W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 9800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 9800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 7 9800X3D

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +42.6% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $871 less on MSRP ($479 MSRP vs $1,350 MSRP).
✅Delivers 179.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 83.4 vs 29.9 PassMark/$ ($479 MSRP vs $1,350 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 155W, a 35W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (23,277 vs 32,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7352, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 7352

2019

Ryzen 7 9800X3D

2024

Why buy it

✅+37.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +42.6% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $871 less on MSRP ($479 MSRP vs $1,350 MSRP).
✅Delivers 179.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 83.4 vs 29.9 PassMark/$ ($479 MSRP vs $1,350 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 155W, a 35W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 9800X3D across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.9 vs 83.4 PassMark/$ ($1,350 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
❌29.2% higher power demand at 155W vs 120W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 9800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 9800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (23,277 vs 32,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7352, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 9800X3D better than EPYC 7352?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 7352 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 9800X3D is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7352 is the better fit. You are getting 37.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 9800X3D is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 9800X3D is $871 cheaper on MSRP at $479 MSRP versus $1,350 MSRP, and it gives you a 42.6% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 7352 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 37.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. It is also 179.0% better value on MSRP (83.4 vs 29.9 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 9800X3D is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of SP3, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 96 MB L3 cache instead of 32 MB, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7352 Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 9800X3D Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7352	Ryzen 7 9800X3D
1080p
low	155 FPS	276 FPS
medium	128 FPS	257 FPS
high	108 FPS	219 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	192 FPS
1440p
low	130 FPS	260 FPS
medium	105 FPS	217 FPS
high	85 FPS	172 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	155 FPS
4K
low	63 FPS	179 FPS
medium	54 FPS	149 FPS
high	43 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	100 FPS

Open EPYC 7352 Open Ryzen 7 9800X3D

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7352	Ryzen 7 9800X3D
1080p
low	354 FPS	880 FPS
medium	312 FPS	713 FPS
high	259 FPS	561 FPS
ultra	210 FPS	474 FPS
1440p
low	301 FPS	697 FPS
medium	273 FPS	591 FPS
high	233 FPS	483 FPS
ultra	185 FPS	383 FPS
4K
low	193 FPS	383 FPS
medium	177 FPS	328 FPS
high	151 FPS	305 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	263 FPS

Open EPYC 7352 Open Ryzen 7 9800X3D

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7352	Ryzen 7 9800X3D
1080p
low	645 FPS	944 FPS
medium	526 FPS	772 FPS
high	468 FPS	698 FPS
ultra	410 FPS	604 FPS
1440p
low	500 FPS	731 FPS
medium	406 FPS	598 FPS
high	355 FPS	529 FPS
ultra	307 FPS	452 FPS
4K
low	368 FPS	506 FPS
medium	286 FPS	419 FPS
high	244 FPS	377 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	316 FPS

Open EPYC 7352 Open Ryzen 7 9800X3D

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7352	Ryzen 7 9800X3D
1080p
low	811 FPS	999 FPS
medium	735 FPS	999 FPS
high	637 FPS	907 FPS
ultra	555 FPS	811 FPS
1440p
low	652 FPS	885 FPS
medium	566 FPS	778 FPS
high	488 FPS	685 FPS
ultra	414 FPS	592 FPS
4K
low	445 FPS	639 FPS
medium	399 FPS	568 FPS
high	356 FPS	507 FPS
ultra	306 FPS	437 FPS

Open EPYC 7352 Open Ryzen 7 9800X3D

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7352 and Ryzen 7 9800X3D

EPYC 7352

The EPYC 7352 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 40,370 points. Launch price was $1,350.

Ryzen 7 9800X3D

The Ryzen 7 9800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 November 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 39,966 points. Launch price was $479.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7352 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen 7 9800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7352 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7352 versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 7 9800X3D — a 47.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 9800X3D (base: 2.3 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The EPYC 7352 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 9800X3D uses Granite Ridge (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7352 scores 40,370 against the Ryzen 7 9800X3D's 39,966 — a 1% lead for the EPYC 7352. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 32,000 vs 23,277 (31.6% advantage for the EPYC 7352). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,112 vs 3,450, a 102.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 9800X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,276 vs 18,500 (87.1% advantage for the Ryzen 7 9800X3D). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7352 vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 9800X3D.

Feature	EPYC 7352	Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+200%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	5.2 GHz+63%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	4.7 GHz+104%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	96 MB (total)+200%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Granite Ridge (2024−2025)
PassMark	40,370+1%	39,966
Cinebench R23 Multi	32,000+37%	23,277
Geekbench 6 Single	1,112	3,450+210%
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,276	18,500+154%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7352 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 9800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7352 versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 9800X3D — the Ryzen 7 9800X3D supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7352 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7352) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 9800X3D). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7352) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 9800X3D) — the EPYC 7352 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7352) and X670E,B650E,X870E,B850 (Ryzen 7 9800X3D).

Feature	EPYC 7352	Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Socket	SP3	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-5600+25%
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+2033%	192 GB
RAM Channels	8+300%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+357%	28

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 9800X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 9800X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7352) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen 7 9800X3D). The Ryzen 7 9800X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 7352 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7352 targets High-density Computing / Server, Ryzen 7 9800X3D targets Extreme Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 7352 rivals Xeon Gold 6242; Ryzen 7 9800X3D rivals Core i9-14900K.

Feature	EPYC 7352	Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon Graphics
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV	AMD-V, AMD-Vi
Target Use	High-density Computing / Server	Extreme Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7352 launched at $1350 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 9800X3D debuted at $479. On MSRP ($1350 vs $479), the Ryzen 7 9800X3D is $871 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7352 delivers 29.9 pts/$ vs 83.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 9800X3D — making the Ryzen 7 9800X3D the 94.5% better value option.