PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core 9 270H

2024

Why buy it

✅+12% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,500 vs 17,500).

Ryzen 7 8845HS

2023

Why buy it

✅+6.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,500 vs 2,800).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).

Core 9 270H

2024

Ryzen 7 8845HS

2023

Why buy it

✅+12% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Why buy it

✅+6.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,500 vs 17,500).

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,500 vs 2,800).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core 9 270H better than Ryzen 7 8845HS?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core 9 270H is ahead with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 34 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 8845HS pulls ahead with 6.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core 9 270H also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 8845HS is the better fit. You are getting 6.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 9 270H still looks like the safer overall buy. Core 9 270H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 34 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 9 270H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core 9 270H Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 8845HS Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core 9 270H	Ryzen 7 8845HS
1080p
low	296 FPS	265 FPS
medium	272 FPS	240 FPS
high	226 FPS	202 FPS
ultra	192 FPS	174 FPS
1440p
low	241 FPS	234 FPS
medium	198 FPS	192 FPS
high	159 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	138 FPS
4K
low	168 FPS	162 FPS
medium	138 FPS	135 FPS
high	105 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	91 FPS

Open Core 9 270H Open Ryzen 7 8845HS

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core 9 270H	Ryzen 7 8845HS
1080p
low	720 FPS	486 FPS
medium	595 FPS	399 FPS
high	490 FPS	341 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	304 FPS
1440p
low	643 FPS	424 FPS
medium	539 FPS	367 FPS
high	445 FPS	314 FPS
ultra	374 FPS	267 FPS
4K
low	379 FPS	280 FPS
medium	324 FPS	253 FPS
high	299 FPS	237 FPS
ultra	258 FPS	204 FPS

Open Core 9 270H Open Ryzen 7 8845HS

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core 9 270H	Ryzen 7 8845HS
1080p
low	720 FPS	712 FPS
medium	720 FPS	712 FPS
high	719 FPS	712 FPS
ultra	617 FPS	623 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	712 FPS
medium	693 FPS	644 FPS
high	594 FPS	544 FPS
ultra	512 FPS	467 FPS
4K
low	607 FPS	540 FPS
medium	513 FPS	474 FPS
high	463 FPS	421 FPS
ultra	389 FPS	357 FPS

Open Core 9 270H Open Ryzen 7 8845HS

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core 9 270H	Ryzen 7 8845HS
1080p
low	720 FPS	712 FPS
medium	720 FPS	712 FPS
high	720 FPS	712 FPS
ultra	720 FPS	712 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	712 FPS
medium	720 FPS	712 FPS
high	720 FPS	657 FPS
ultra	636 FPS	572 FPS
4K
low	642 FPS	574 FPS
medium	570 FPS	511 FPS
high	510 FPS	455 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	393 FPS

Open Core 9 270H Open Ryzen 7 8845HS

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 9 270H and Ryzen 7 8845HS

Core 9 270H

The Core 9 270H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,793 points. Launch price was $697.

Ryzen 7 8845HS

The Ryzen 7 8845HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,470 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 9 270H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8845HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core 9 270H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.8 GHz on the Core 9 270H versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8845HS — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Core 9 270H (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core 9 270H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8845HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core 9 270H scores 28,793 against the Ryzen 7 8845HS's 28,470 — a 1.1% lead for the Core 9 270H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,500 vs 17,500 (5.9% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8845HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 2,500, a 11.3% lead for the Core 9 270H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,000 vs 12,250 (13.3% advantage for the Core 9 270H). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core 9 270H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8845HS.

Feature	Core 9 270H	Ryzen 7 8845HS
Cores / Threads	14 / 20+75%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.8 GHz+14%	5.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	3.8 GHz+41%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)+50%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	4 nm-60%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
PassMark	28,793+1%	28,470
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,500	17,500+6%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,800+12%	2,500
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,000+14%	12,250

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 9 270H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 8845HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 8845HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 90.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Mobile platform (Core 9 270H) and SoC (Ryzen 7 8845HS).

Feature	Core 9 270H	Ryzen 7 8845HS
Socket	FCBGA1744	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6400	LPDDR5x-7500
Max RAM Capacity	96 GB	256 GB+167%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core 9 270H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 8845HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core 9 270H) vs AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 7 8845HS). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Xe Graphics (96 EUs) (Core 9 270H) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 8845HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 9 270H targets Extreme Gaming Laptop, Ryzen 7 8845HS targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core 9 270H rivals Ryzen 9 9900H; Ryzen 7 8845HS rivals Core i7-13700H.

Feature	Core 9 270H	Ryzen 7 8845HS
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel Xe Graphics (96 EUs)	Radeon 780M
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V (SVM)
Target Use	Extreme Gaming Laptop	Gaming