
Core Ultra 5 245K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 8840HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 245K
2024Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $319 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8840HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 55W.
Ryzen 7 8840HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 125W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (42,275 vs 43,417).
Core Ultra 5 245K
2024Ryzen 7 8840HX
2025Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 125W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $319 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8840HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (42,275 vs 43,417).
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 245K better than Ryzen 7 8840HX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 245K | Ryzen 7 8840HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 252 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 96 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 245K | Ryzen 7 8840HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 687 FPS | 654 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 566 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 438 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 596 FPS | 554 FPS |
| medium | 522 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 377 FPS | 303 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 312 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 283 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 212 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 245K | Ryzen 7 8840HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 851 FPS | 847 FPS |
| medium | 694 FPS | 677 FPS |
| high | 617 FPS | 599 FPS |
| ultra | 528 FPS | 514 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 731 FPS | 676 FPS |
| medium | 599 FPS | 541 FPS |
| high | 521 FPS | 468 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 483 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 384 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 245K | Ryzen 7 8840HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1085 FPS | 1057 FPS |
| medium | 1015 FPS | 966 FPS |
| high | 889 FPS | 843 FPS |
| ultra | 808 FPS | 760 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 892 FPS | 842 FPS |
| medium | 789 FPS | 747 FPS |
| high | 687 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 611 FPS | 566 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 542 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 489 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 421 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 245K and Ryzen 7 8840HX

Core Ultra 5 245K
Core Ultra 5 245K
The Core Ultra 5 245K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 43,417 points. Launch price was $319.


Ryzen 7 8840HX
Ryzen 7 8840HX
The Ryzen 7 8840HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 April 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Dragon Range (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 42,275 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 245K packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8840HX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core Ultra 5 245K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245K versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8840HX — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 245K (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 245K uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8840HX uses Dragon Range (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 245K scores 43,417 against the Ryzen 7 8840HX's 42,275 — a 2.7% lead for the Core Ultra 5 245K. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 245K vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8840HX.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245K | Ryzen 7 8840HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 14+17% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+2% | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+45% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+200% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-40% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Dragon Range (2025) |
| PassMark | 43,417+3% | 42,275 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 245K uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 8840HX uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the Core Ultra 5 245K versus 5600 on the Ryzen 7 8840HX — the Core Ultra 5 245K supports 13.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 245K supports up to 192 of RAM compared to 64 — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core Ultra 5 245K) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 8840HX) — the Ryzen 7 8840HX offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 245K) and FP8,FP7 (Ryzen 7 8840HX).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245K | Ryzen 7 8840HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | FL1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400+14% | 5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192+200% | 64 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 5 245K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 8840HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 245K) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 7 8840HX). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) (Core Ultra 5 245K) and AMD Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 8840HX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 245K rivals Ryzen 5 9600X; Ryzen 7 8840HX rivals Core i7-13700H.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245K | Ryzen 7 8840HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) | AMD Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












