
Core i9-13900HX
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 8840HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-13900HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen 7 8840HX.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 7 8840HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (42,275 vs 42,437).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-13900HX.
Core i9-13900HX
2023Ryzen 7 8840HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen 7 8840HX.
Why buy it
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (42,275 vs 42,437).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-13900HX.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900HX better than Ryzen 7 8840HX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900HX | Ryzen 7 8840HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 311 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 252 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 96 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900HX | Ryzen 7 8840HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 654 FPS |
| medium | 350 FPS | 566 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 252 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 554 FPS |
| medium | 306 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 303 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 312 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 283 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 212 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-13900HX | Ryzen 7 8840HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 762 FPS | 847 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 677 FPS |
| high | 543 FPS | 599 FPS |
| ultra | 467 FPS | 514 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 680 FPS | 676 FPS |
| medium | 567 FPS | 541 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 468 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 483 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-13900HX | Ryzen 7 8840HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1012 FPS | 1057 FPS |
| medium | 905 FPS | 966 FPS |
| high | 792 FPS | 843 FPS |
| ultra | 704 FPS | 760 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 840 FPS | 842 FPS |
| medium | 739 FPS | 747 FPS |
| high | 646 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 568 FPS | 566 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 620 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 555 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 491 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 421 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900HX and Ryzen 7 8840HX

Core i9-13900HX
Core i9-13900HX
The Core i9-13900HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 42,437 points. Launch price was $668.


Ryzen 7 8840HX
Ryzen 7 8840HX
The Ryzen 7 8840HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 April 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Dragon Range (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 42,275 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900HX packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8840HX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i9-13900HX has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900HX versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8840HX — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900HX (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i9-13900HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8840HX uses Dragon Range (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900HX scores 42,437 against the Ryzen 7 8840HX's 42,275 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i9-13900HX. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900HX vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8840HX.
| Feature | Core i9-13900HX | Ryzen 7 8840HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+100% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+6% | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.9 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+78% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) | Dragon Range (2025) |
| PassMark | 42,437 | 42,275 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 29,493 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,878 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,944 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 8840HX uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 on the Core i9-13900HX versus 5600 on the Ryzen 7 8840HX — the Ryzen 7 8840HX supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-13900HX supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900HX) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 8840HX) — the Ryzen 7 8840HX offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM770,WM790 (Core i9-13900HX) and FP8,FP7 (Ryzen 7 8840HX).
| Feature | Core i9-13900HX | Ryzen 7 8840HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | FL1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 | 5600+111900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+314572700% | 64 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-13900HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 8840HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-13900HX) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 7 8840HX). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-13900HX) and AMD Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 8840HX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13900HX targets Performance Gaming / Mobile Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i9-13900HX rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX; Ryzen 7 8840HX rivals Core i7-13700H.
| Feature | Core i9-13900HX | Ryzen 7 8840HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | AMD Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | Performance Gaming / Mobile Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












