
Core i7-13790F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 8840HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13790F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (33 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $392 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8840HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 8840HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 8840HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 33 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 780M, while Core i7-13790F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13790F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (42,275 vs 43,549).
Core i7-13790F
2023Ryzen 7 8840HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 33 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 780M, while Core i7-13790F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (33 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $392 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8840HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 8840HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13790F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (42,275 vs 43,549).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13790F better than Ryzen 7 8840HX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13790F | Ryzen 7 8840HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 256 FPS | 252 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13790F | Ryzen 7 8840HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 361 FPS | 654 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 566 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 233 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 554 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 303 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 312 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 283 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 212 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13790F | Ryzen 7 8840HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1025 FPS | 847 FPS |
| medium | 1011 FPS | 677 FPS |
| high | 933 FPS | 599 FPS |
| ultra | 803 FPS | 514 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 969 FPS | 676 FPS |
| medium | 858 FPS | 541 FPS |
| high | 775 FPS | 468 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 588 FPS | 483 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 455 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 387 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13790F | Ryzen 7 8840HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1089 FPS | 1057 FPS |
| medium | 1015 FPS | 966 FPS |
| high | 876 FPS | 843 FPS |
| ultra | 767 FPS | 760 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 960 FPS | 842 FPS |
| medium | 844 FPS | 747 FPS |
| high | 722 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 620 FPS | 566 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 605 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 421 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13790F and Ryzen 7 8840HX

Core i7-13790F
Core i7-13790F
The Core i7-13790F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 43,549 points. Launch price was $441.


Ryzen 7 8840HX
Ryzen 7 8840HX
The Ryzen 7 8840HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 April 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Dragon Range (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 42,275 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13790F packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8840HX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13790F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13790F versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8840HX — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-13790F (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i7-13790F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8840HX uses Dragon Range (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13790F scores 43,549 against the Ryzen 7 8840HX's 42,275 — a 3% lead for the Core i7-13790F. L3 cache: 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-13790F vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8840HX.
| Feature | Core i7-13790F | Ryzen 7 8840HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+2% | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.9 GHz+38% |
| L3 Cache | 33 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+94% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 5 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Dragon Range (2025) |
| PassMark | 43,549+3% | 42,275 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 26,247 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,815 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,673 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13790F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 8840HX uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13790F versus 5600 on the Ryzen 7 8840HX — the Ryzen 7 8840HX supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13790F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-13790F) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 8840HX) — the Ryzen 7 8840HX offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i7-13790F) and FP8,FP7 (Ryzen 7 8840HX).
| Feature | Core i7-13790F | Ryzen 7 8840HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FL1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | 5600+111900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+314572700% | 64 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 28+75% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13790F) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 7 8840HX). The Ryzen 7 8840HX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 780M), while the Core i7-13790F requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 8840HX rivals Core i7-13700H.
| Feature | Core i7-13790F | Ryzen 7 8840HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












