PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 8700F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,929 less on MSRP ($270 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 718.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 115.7 vs 14.1 PassMark/$ ($270 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 22 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3245, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-3245

2019

Why buy it

✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8700F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,000 vs 18,040).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.1 vs 115.7 PassMark/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8700F moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Ryzen 7 8700F

2024

Xeon W-3245

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,929 less on MSRP ($270 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 718.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 115.7 vs 14.1 PassMark/$ ($270 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 22 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3245, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8700F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,000 vs 18,040).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.1 vs 115.7 PassMark/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8700F moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 8700F better than Xeon W-3245?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-3245 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 8700F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 8700F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 10.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 8700F is the better fit. You are getting 0.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 8700F is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 8700F is $1,929 cheaper on MSRP at $270 MSRP versus $2,199 MSRP, and it gives you a 10.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 718.4% better value on MSRP (115.7 vs 14.1 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 8700F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 16/32. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 8700F Benchmark Check

Xeon W-3245 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 8700F	Xeon W-3245
1080p
low	266 FPS	185 FPS
medium	240 FPS	150 FPS
high	206 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	233 FPS	148 FPS
medium	190 FPS	117 FPS
high	158 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	158 FPS	82 FPS
medium	131 FPS	70 FPS
high	102 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	44 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 8700F Open Xeon W-3245

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 8700F	Xeon W-3245
1080p
low	483 FPS	531 FPS
medium	403 FPS	447 FPS
high	347 FPS	372 FPS
ultra	308 FPS	335 FPS
1440p
low	423 FPS	461 FPS
medium	374 FPS	399 FPS
high	322 FPS	336 FPS
ultra	273 FPS	290 FPS
4K
low	283 FPS	287 FPS
medium	259 FPS	248 FPS
high	244 FPS	228 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	199 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 8700F Open Xeon W-3245

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 8700F	Xeon W-3245
1080p
low	781 FPS	777 FPS
medium	781 FPS	777 FPS
high	767 FPS	777 FPS
ultra	649 FPS	777 FPS
1440p
low	766 FPS	777 FPS
medium	629 FPS	715 FPS
high	544 FPS	677 FPS
ultra	463 FPS	603 FPS
4K
low	530 FPS	524 FPS
medium	457 FPS	428 FPS
high	402 FPS	387 FPS
ultra	338 FPS	314 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 8700F Open Xeon W-3245

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 8700F	Xeon W-3245
1080p
low	781 FPS	777 FPS
medium	781 FPS	777 FPS
high	781 FPS	777 FPS
ultra	781 FPS	753 FPS
1440p
low	781 FPS	777 FPS
medium	781 FPS	777 FPS
high	692 FPS	696 FPS
ultra	602 FPS	601 FPS
4K
low	615 FPS	646 FPS
medium	553 FPS	566 FPS
high	495 FPS	504 FPS
ultra	431 FPS	437 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 8700F Open Xeon W-3245

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 8700F and Xeon W-3245

Ryzen 7 8700F

The Ryzen 7 8700F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,240 points. Launch price was $270.

Xeon W-3245

The Xeon W-3245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 31,089 points. Launch price was $1,999.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 8700F packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-3245 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon W-3245 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8700F versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3245 — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F (base: 4.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 8700F uses the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-3245 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 8700F scores 31,240 against the Xeon W-3245's 31,089 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 8700F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,040 vs 18,000 (0.2% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,649 vs 1,353, a 64.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 8700F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,500 vs 11,698 (14.3% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8700F vs 22 MB on the Xeon W-3245.

Feature	Ryzen 7 8700F	Xeon W-3245
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+9%	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	4.1 GHz+28%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	22 MB+38%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	16 MB+1500%
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Phoenix (2023−2024)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	31,240	31,089
Cinebench R23 Multi	18,040	18,000
Geekbench 6 Single	2,649+96%	1,353
Geekbench 6 Multi	13,500+15%	11,698

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 8700F uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3245 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 8700F versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-3245 — the Ryzen 7 8700F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3245 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 8700F) vs 6 (Xeon W-3245). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 8700F) vs 64 (Xeon W-3245) — the Xeon W-3245 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: XB650,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 8700F) and C621 (Xeon W-3245).

Feature	Ryzen 7 8700F	Xeon W-3245
Socket	AM5	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200+25%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	1024 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	64+220%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 8700F has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 8700F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-3245). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 8700F targets High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU, Xeon W-3245 targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 8700F rivals Core i7-14700F; Xeon W-3245 rivals Threadripper 2950X.

Feature	Ryzen 7 8700F	Xeon W-3245
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU	Professional Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 8700F launched at $270 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3245 debuted at $2199. On MSRP ($270 vs $2199), the Ryzen 7 8700F is $1929 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 8700F delivers 115.7 pts/$ vs 14.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3245 — making the Ryzen 7 8700F the 156.4% better value option.