PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 8700F

2024

Why buy it

✅+5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Costs $1,063 less on MSRP ($270 MSRP vs $1,333 MSRP).
✅Delivers 397.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 115.7 vs 23.2 PassMark/$ ($270 MSRP vs $1,333 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2295 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2295, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-2295

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+54.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (12,863 vs 13,500).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.2 vs 115.7 PassMark/$ ($1,333 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8700F moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 8700F.

Ryzen 7 8700F

2024

Xeon W-2295

2019

Why buy it

✅+5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Costs $1,063 less on MSRP ($270 MSRP vs $1,333 MSRP).
✅Delivers 397.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 115.7 vs 23.2 PassMark/$ ($270 MSRP vs $1,333 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+54.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2295 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2295, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (12,863 vs 13,500).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.2 vs 115.7 PassMark/$ ($1,333 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8700F moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 8700F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 8700F better than Xeon W-2295?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-2295 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 8700F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 8700F is the better fit. You are getting 5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 8700F is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 8700F is $1,063 cheaper on MSRP at $270 MSRP versus $1,333 MSRP, and it gives you 5% better Geekbench multi-core. The trade-off is that Xeon W-2295 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 8.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 397.8% better value on MSRP (115.7 vs 23.2 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 8700F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA2066, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 18/36. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 8700F Benchmark Check

Xeon W-2295 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 8700F	Xeon W-2295
1080p
low	266 FPS	286 FPS
medium	240 FPS	254 FPS
high	206 FPS	211 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	177 FPS
1440p
low	233 FPS	234 FPS
medium	190 FPS	190 FPS
high	158 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	158 FPS	165 FPS
medium	131 FPS	134 FPS
high	102 FPS	106 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	91 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 8700F Open Xeon W-2295

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 8700F	Xeon W-2295
1080p
low	483 FPS	551 FPS
medium	403 FPS	457 FPS
high	347 FPS	383 FPS
ultra	308 FPS	345 FPS
1440p
low	423 FPS	457 FPS
medium	374 FPS	395 FPS
high	322 FPS	337 FPS
ultra	273 FPS	291 FPS
4K
low	283 FPS	286 FPS
medium	259 FPS	248 FPS
high	244 FPS	230 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	201 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 8700F Open Xeon W-2295

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 8700F	Xeon W-2295
1080p
low	781 FPS	775 FPS
medium	781 FPS	775 FPS
high	767 FPS	775 FPS
ultra	649 FPS	775 FPS
1440p
low	766 FPS	775 FPS
medium	629 FPS	775 FPS
high	544 FPS	775 FPS
ultra	463 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	530 FPS	620 FPS
medium	457 FPS	522 FPS
high	402 FPS	462 FPS
ultra	338 FPS	389 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 8700F Open Xeon W-2295

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 8700F	Xeon W-2295
1080p
low	781 FPS	775 FPS
medium	781 FPS	775 FPS
high	781 FPS	775 FPS
ultra	781 FPS	775 FPS
1440p
low	781 FPS	775 FPS
medium	781 FPS	775 FPS
high	692 FPS	742 FPS
ultra	602 FPS	631 FPS
4K
low	615 FPS	704 FPS
medium	553 FPS	611 FPS
high	495 FPS	538 FPS
ultra	431 FPS	437 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 8700F Open Xeon W-2295

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 8700F and Xeon W-2295

Ryzen 7 8700F

The Ryzen 7 8700F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,240 points. Launch price was $270.

Xeon W-2295

The Xeon W-2295 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,986 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 8700F packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2295 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon W-2295 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8700F versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon W-2295 — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F (base: 4.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 8700F is built on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 8700F scores 31,240 against the Xeon W-2295's 30,986 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 8700F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,649 vs 1,703, a 43.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 8700F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,500 vs 12,863 (4.8% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8700F vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon W-2295.

Feature	Ryzen 7 8700F	Xeon W-2295
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	18 / 36+125%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+4%	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	4.1 GHz+37%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	24.75 MB+55%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	—
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Phoenix (2023−2024)	—
PassMark	31,240	30,986
Cinebench R23 Multi	18,040	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,649+56%	1,703
Geekbench 6 Multi	13,500+5%	12,863

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 8700F uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2295 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 8700F versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-2295 — the Ryzen 7 8700F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-2295 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 8700F) vs 4 (Xeon W-2295). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 8700F) vs 48 (Xeon W-2295) — the Xeon W-2295 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: XB650,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 8700F) and C422 (Xeon W-2295).

Feature	Ryzen 7 8700F	Xeon W-2295
Socket	AM5	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200+25%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	1024 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 8700F has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 8700F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-2295). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 8700F targets High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU, Xeon W-2295 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 8700F rivals Core i7-14700F.

Feature	Ryzen 7 8700F	Xeon W-2295
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 8700F launched at $270 MSRP, while the Xeon W-2295 debuted at $1333. On MSRP ($270 vs $1333), the Ryzen 7 8700F is $1063 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 8700F delivers 115.7 pts/$ vs 23.2 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2295 — making the Ryzen 7 8700F the 133.1% better value option.