
Ryzen 7 8700F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 8700F
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $429 less on MSRP ($270 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 29.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 115.7 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($270 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Spire), unlike Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,040 vs 38,581).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.7% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Ryzen 7 8700F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 89.2 vs 115.7 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 8700F.
Ryzen 7 8700F
2024Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $429 less on MSRP ($270 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 29.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 115.7 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($270 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Spire), unlike Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.7% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Ryzen 7 8700F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,040 vs 38,581).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 89.2 vs 115.7 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 8700F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Ryzen 7 8700F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 8700F | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 8700F | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 347 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 423 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 273 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 283 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 8700F | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 781 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 781 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 767 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 649 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 766 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 629 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 544 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 463 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 457 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 402 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 338 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 8700F | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 781 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 781 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 781 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 781 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 781 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 781 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 692 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 602 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 431 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 8700F and Ryzen 9 7950X3D


Ryzen 7 8700F
Ryzen 7 8700F
The Ryzen 7 8700F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,240 points. Launch price was $270.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 8700F packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8700F versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 13.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 4.1 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 8700F uses the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 8700F scores 31,240 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 66.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,040 vs 38,581 (72.6% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,649 vs 2,926, a 9.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,500 vs 19,643 (37.1% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8700F vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 8700F | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5.7 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 4.1 GHz | 4.2 GHz+2% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+700% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix (2023−2024) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 31,240 | 62,323+99% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,040 | 38,581+114% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,649 | 2,926+10% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,500 | 19,643+46% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM5 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 8700F supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 8700F) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: XB650,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 8700F) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 8700F | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 8700F) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen 7 8700F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 8700F targets High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 8700F rivals Core i7-14700F; Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 8700F | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 8700F launched at $270 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D debuted at $699. On MSRP ($270 vs $699), the Ryzen 7 8700F is $429 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 8700F delivers 115.7 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — making the Ryzen 7 8700F the 25.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 8700F | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $270-61% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 115.7+30% | 89.2 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












