
Ryzen 5 7600X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 8700F
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Ryzen 7 8700F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8700F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,300 vs 18,040).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 94.7 vs 115.7 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 8700F.
Ryzen 7 8700F
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.1% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($270 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 22.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 115.7 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($270 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Spire), unlike Ryzen 5 7600X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Ryzen 7 8700F
2024Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Ryzen 7 8700F needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.1% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($270 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 22.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 115.7 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($270 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Spire), unlike Ryzen 5 7600X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8700F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,300 vs 18,040).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 94.7 vs 115.7 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 8700F.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 8700F better than Ryzen 5 7600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 7 8700F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 7 8700F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 483 FPS |
| medium | 524 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 436 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 308 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 423 FPS |
| medium | 455 FPS | 374 FPS |
| high | 388 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 273 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 271 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 232 FPS | 209 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 7 8700F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 781 FPS |
| medium | 652 FPS | 781 FPS |
| high | 571 FPS | 767 FPS |
| ultra | 484 FPS | 649 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 766 FPS |
| medium | 554 FPS | 629 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 544 FPS |
| ultra | 409 FPS | 463 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 463 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 402 FPS |
| ultra | 281 FPS | 338 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 7 8700F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 781 FPS |
| medium | 708 FPS | 781 FPS |
| high | 708 FPS | 781 FPS |
| ultra | 708 FPS | 781 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 781 FPS |
| medium | 708 FPS | 781 FPS |
| high | 658 FPS | 692 FPS |
| ultra | 571 FPS | 602 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 502 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 391 FPS | 431 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7600X and Ryzen 7 8700F


Ryzen 5 7600X
Ryzen 5 7600X
The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 8700F
Ryzen 7 8700F
The Ryzen 7 8700F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,240 points. Launch price was $270.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8700F offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 8700F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8700F — a 5.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 4.7 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8700F uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7600X scores 28,325 against the Ryzen 7 8700F's 31,240 — a 9.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 8700F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,300 vs 18,040 (16.4% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,900 vs 2,649, a 9% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,800 vs 13,500 (2.2% advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8700F.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 7 8700F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+6% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.7 GHz+15% | 4.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) | Phoenix (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 28,325 | 31,240+10% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,300 | 18,040+18% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,900+9% | 2,649 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,800+2% | 13,500 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 8700F supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 8700F) — the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X) and XB650,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 8700F).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 7 8700F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+40% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The Ryzen 5 7600X includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Ryzen 7 8700F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming, Ryzen 7 8700F targets High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K; Ryzen 7 8700F rivals Core i7-14700F.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 7 8700F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 7600X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 8700F debuted at $270. On MSRP ($299 vs $270), the Ryzen 7 8700F is $29 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 7600X delivers 94.7 pts/$ vs 115.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 8700F — making the Ryzen 7 8700F the 19.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 7 8700F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $270-10% |
| Performance per Dollar | 94.7 | 115.7+22% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












