
Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7840S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS
2024Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,227 vs 23,290).
- ❌462.5% higher power demand at 45W vs 8W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7840S can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7840S
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 45W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS
2024Ryzen 7 7840S
2023Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 45W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,227 vs 23,290).
- ❌462.5% higher power demand at 45W vs 8W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7840S can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7840S better than Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS | Ryzen 7 7840S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 232 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS | Ryzen 7 7840S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 358 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 314 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 445 FPS |
| medium | 325 FPS | 386 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 224 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 216 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS | Ryzen 7 7840S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 581 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 581 FPS | 582 FPS |
| ultra | 581 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 581 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 446 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 492 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 303 FPS | 355 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS | Ryzen 7 7840S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 581 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 581 FPS | 582 FPS |
| ultra | 581 FPS | 582 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 581 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 581 FPS | 582 FPS |
| ultra | 581 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 581 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 548 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS and Ryzen 7 7840S


Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS
Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS
The Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,227 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 7840S
Ryzen 7 7840S
The Ryzen 7 7840S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,290 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7840S offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 7840S has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840S — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840S (base: 4.3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7840S uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS scores 23,227 against the Ryzen 7 7840S's 23,290 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 7840S. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 7840S.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS | Ryzen 7 7840S |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5.1 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+13% | 3.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 8 MB+700% |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point (2024−2025) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 23,227 | 23,290 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 13,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,570 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 13,535 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 7840S uses FP7/FP7r2/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS | Ryzen 7 7840S |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | FP7/FP7r2/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5600, LPDDR5x-7500 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 256 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS) / AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 7 7840S). The Ryzen 7 7840S includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7840S targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7840S rivals Core i7-1360P.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS | Ryzen 7 7840S |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V (SVM) |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












