
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7840HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.2% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
Ryzen 7 7840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,854 vs 18,500).
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Ryzen 7 7840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.2% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,854 vs 18,500).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than Ryzen 7 7840HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 737 FPS | 406 FPS |
| high | 580 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 722 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 611 FPS | 374 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 398 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 396 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 315 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 273 FPS | 208 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 857 FPS | 713 FPS |
| high | 857 FPS | 713 FPS |
| ultra | 857 FPS | 624 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 851 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 786 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 467 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 558 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 357 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 857 FPS | 713 FPS |
| high | 857 FPS | 713 FPS |
| ultra | 782 FPS | 713 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 760 FPS | 713 FPS |
| high | 669 FPS | 658 FPS |
| ultra | 576 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 618 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 556 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 456 FPS |
| ultra | 428 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Ryzen 7 7840HS


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.


Ryzen 7 7840HS
Ryzen 7 7840HS
The Ryzen 7 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,538 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Ryzen 7 7840HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840HS — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS (base: 4.4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7840HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 34,293 against the Ryzen 7 7840HS's 28,538 — a 18.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,500 vs 16,854 (9.3% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,700 vs 1,962, a 31.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,000 vs 11,898 (23.1% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D). L3 cache: 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5.1 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 4.4 GHz+16% | 3.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 96 MB (total)+500% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 34,293+20% | 28,538 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,500+10% | 16,854 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,700+38% | 1,962 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,000+26% | 11,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7840HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 7840HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) — the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 7840HS).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+40% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 7840HS). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 7840HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming, Ryzen 7 7840HS targets High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K; Ryzen 7 7840HS rivals Core i7-13700H.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V, SVM |
| Target Use | Gaming | High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












