PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 260

2025

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (28,339 vs 28,538).
❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.

Ryzen 7 7840HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen 7 260

2025

Ryzen 7 7840HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (28,339 vs 28,538).
❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 7840HS better than Ryzen 7 260?

Yes. Ryzen 7 7840HS is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 7840HS is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 5.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 7840HS is the better fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 7840HS is the smarter buy by a wide margin for any fresh desktop build. Ryzen 7 7840HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it gives you a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 260 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop CPU, not because it is a serious desktop gaming option. It simply cannot keep up with modern games, especially when the gap is already 5.6% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 260 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 260 Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 7840HS Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 260	Ryzen 7 7840HS
1080p
low	265 FPS	267 FPS
medium	240 FPS	242 FPS
high	202 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	174 FPS	176 FPS
1440p
low	234 FPS	235 FPS
medium	192 FPS	193 FPS
high	156 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	139 FPS
4K
low	162 FPS	163 FPS
medium	135 FPS	136 FPS
high	104 FPS	105 FPS
ultra	91 FPS	92 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 260 Open Ryzen 7 7840HS

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 260	Ryzen 7 7840HS
1080p
low	486 FPS	495 FPS
medium	399 FPS	406 FPS
high	341 FPS	347 FPS
ultra	304 FPS	309 FPS
1440p
low	424 FPS	432 FPS
medium	367 FPS	374 FPS
high	314 FPS	320 FPS
ultra	267 FPS	272 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	285 FPS
medium	253 FPS	258 FPS
high	237 FPS	242 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	208 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 260 Open Ryzen 7 7840HS

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 260	Ryzen 7 7840HS
1080p
low	708 FPS	713 FPS
medium	708 FPS	713 FPS
high	708 FPS	713 FPS
ultra	623 FPS	624 FPS
1440p
low	708 FPS	713 FPS
medium	644 FPS	646 FPS
high	544 FPS	545 FPS
ultra	467 FPS	467 FPS
4K
low	540 FPS	544 FPS
medium	474 FPS	475 FPS
high	421 FPS	422 FPS
ultra	357 FPS	357 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 260 Open Ryzen 7 7840HS

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 260	Ryzen 7 7840HS
1080p
low	708 FPS	713 FPS
medium	708 FPS	713 FPS
high	708 FPS	713 FPS
ultra	708 FPS	713 FPS
1440p
low	708 FPS	713 FPS
medium	708 FPS	713 FPS
high	657 FPS	658 FPS
ultra	572 FPS	573 FPS
4K
low	574 FPS	574 FPS
medium	511 FPS	511 FPS
high	455 FPS	456 FPS
ultra	393 FPS	394 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 260 Open Ryzen 7 7840HS

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 260 and Ryzen 7 7840HS

Ryzen 7 260

The Ryzen 7 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,339 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 7 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,538 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 260 and Ryzen 7 7840HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 260 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840HS — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 260 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7840HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 260 scores 28,339 against the Ryzen 7 7840HS's 28,538 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 7840HS. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Ryzen 7 260	Ryzen 7 7840HS
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz	5.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz	3.8 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm	4 nm
Architecture	Hawk Point (2024−2025)	Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark	28,339	28,538
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,854
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,962
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,898

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FP8 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 7840HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Ryzen 7 260	Ryzen 7 7840HS
Socket	FP8	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	256 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 7840HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 260) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 7840HS). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 260) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 7840HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 260 targets Mobile, Ryzen 7 7840HS targets High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7840HS rivals Core i7-13700H.

Feature	Ryzen 7 260	Ryzen 7 7840HS
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon 780M	Radeon 780M
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	AMD-V, SVM
Target Use	Mobile	High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC