PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7303

2023

Why buy it

✅+6.8% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840HS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌271.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7840HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 7 7840HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +37.4% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 130W, a 95W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while EPYC 7303 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,854 vs 18,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7303, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 7303

2023

Ryzen 7 7840HS

2023

Why buy it

✅+6.8% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +37.4% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 130W, a 95W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while EPYC 7303 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840HS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌271.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7840HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,854 vs 18,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7303, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 7840HS better than EPYC 7303?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 7303 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 7840HS is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7303 is the better fit. You are getting 6.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 7840HS still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen 7 7840HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 37.4% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 7840HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of SP3 and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7303 Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 7840HS Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7303	Ryzen 7 7840HS
1080p
low	159 FPS	267 FPS
medium	130 FPS	242 FPS
high	109 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	176 FPS
1440p
low	141 FPS	235 FPS
medium	113 FPS	193 FPS
high	89 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	139 FPS
4K
low	68 FPS	163 FPS
medium	57 FPS	136 FPS
high	45 FPS	105 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	92 FPS

Open EPYC 7303 Open Ryzen 7 7840HS

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7303	Ryzen 7 7840HS
1080p
low	390 FPS	495 FPS
medium	346 FPS	406 FPS
high	283 FPS	347 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	309 FPS
1440p
low	329 FPS	432 FPS
medium	297 FPS	374 FPS
high	251 FPS	320 FPS
ultra	192 FPS	272 FPS
4K
low	203 FPS	285 FPS
medium	186 FPS	258 FPS
high	158 FPS	242 FPS
ultra	127 FPS	208 FPS

Open EPYC 7303 Open Ryzen 7 7840HS

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7303	Ryzen 7 7840HS
1080p
low	644 FPS	713 FPS
medium	526 FPS	713 FPS
high	469 FPS	713 FPS
ultra	411 FPS	624 FPS
1440p
low	499 FPS	713 FPS
medium	406 FPS	646 FPS
high	356 FPS	545 FPS
ultra	310 FPS	467 FPS
4K
low	368 FPS	544 FPS
medium	286 FPS	475 FPS
high	244 FPS	422 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	357 FPS

Open EPYC 7303 Open Ryzen 7 7840HS

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7303	Ryzen 7 7840HS
1080p
low	714 FPS	713 FPS
medium	714 FPS	713 FPS
high	696 FPS	713 FPS
ultra	610 FPS	713 FPS
1440p
low	696 FPS	713 FPS
medium	608 FPS	713 FPS
high	521 FPS	658 FPS
ultra	446 FPS	573 FPS
4K
low	498 FPS	574 FPS
medium	445 FPS	511 FPS
high	390 FPS	456 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	394 FPS

Open EPYC 7303 Open Ryzen 7 7840HS

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7303 and Ryzen 7 7840HS

EPYC 7303

The EPYC 7303 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 28,572 points. Launch price was $604.

Ryzen 7 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,538 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7303 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7303 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7303 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840HS — a 40% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 7303 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7840HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7303 scores 28,572 against the Ryzen 7 7840HS's 28,538 — a 0.1% lead for the EPYC 7303. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,000 vs 16,854 (6.6% advantage for the EPYC 7303). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,960 vs 1,962, a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 7840HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,000 vs 11,898 (7.8% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7303 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840HS.

Feature	EPYC 7303	Ryzen 7 7840HS
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	5.1 GHz+50%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.8 GHz+58%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+300%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark	28,572	28,538
Cinebench R23 Multi	18,000+7%	16,854
Geekbench 6 Single	1,960	1,962
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,000	11,898+8%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7303 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 7840HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7303 versus LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 7840HS — the Ryzen 7 7840HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 7840HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 204 GB — 22.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7303) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 7840HS). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7303) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) — the EPYC 7303 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 platform (EPYC 7303) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 7840HS).

Feature	EPYC 7303	Ryzen 7 7840HS
Socket	SP3	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600+25%
Max RAM Capacity	204 GB	256 GB+25%
RAM Channels	8+300%	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	128+540%	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 7840HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support AMD-V, SVM virtualization. The Ryzen 7 7840HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the EPYC 7303 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7303 targets High-frequency Server Workloads, Ryzen 7 7840HS targets High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC. Direct competitor: EPYC 7303 rivals Xeon Gold 6334; Ryzen 7 7840HS rivals Core i7-13700H.

Feature	EPYC 7303	Ryzen 7 7840HS
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon 780M
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SVM	AMD-V, SVM
Target Use	High-frequency Server Workloads	High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC