PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-12700E

2022

Why buy it

✅+18.7% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $314 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Ryzen 7 7840HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +27.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,854 vs 20,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).

Core i7-12700E

2022

Ryzen 7 7840HS

2023

Why buy it

✅+18.7% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +27.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $314 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,854 vs 20,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 7840HS better than Core i7-12700E?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 7 7840HS is ahead with a 27.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-12700E pulls ahead with 18.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i7-12700E also has the bigger cache pool with 56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-12700E is the better fit. You are getting 18.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 12 cores and 20 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 7840HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i7-12700E makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 7 7840HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $314 MSRP, and it gives you a 27.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Core i7-12700E is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 18.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i7-12700E is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (90.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 7840HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-12700E Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 7840HS Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-12700E	Ryzen 7 7840HS
1080p
low	250 FPS	267 FPS
medium	235 FPS	242 FPS
high	200 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	172 FPS	176 FPS
1440p
low	217 FPS	235 FPS
medium	185 FPS	193 FPS
high	153 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	139 FPS
4K
low	151 FPS	163 FPS
medium	128 FPS	136 FPS
high	100 FPS	105 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	92 FPS

Open Core i7-12700E Open Ryzen 7 7840HS

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-12700E	Ryzen 7 7840HS
1080p
low	331 FPS	495 FPS
medium	280 FPS	406 FPS
high	237 FPS	347 FPS
ultra	212 FPS	309 FPS
1440p
low	273 FPS	432 FPS
medium	242 FPS	374 FPS
high	210 FPS	320 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	272 FPS
4K
low	168 FPS	285 FPS
medium	150 FPS	258 FPS
high	142 FPS	242 FPS
ultra	123 FPS	208 FPS

Open Core i7-12700E Open Ryzen 7 7840HS

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-12700E	Ryzen 7 7840HS
1080p
low	708 FPS	713 FPS
medium	672 FPS	713 FPS
high	590 FPS	713 FPS
ultra	487 FPS	624 FPS
1440p
low	708 FPS	713 FPS
medium	586 FPS	646 FPS
high	508 FPS	545 FPS
ultra	428 FPS	467 FPS
4K
low	522 FPS	544 FPS
medium	428 FPS	475 FPS
high	382 FPS	422 FPS
ultra	319 FPS	357 FPS

Open Core i7-12700E Open Ryzen 7 7840HS

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-12700E	Ryzen 7 7840HS
1080p
low	708 FPS	713 FPS
medium	708 FPS	713 FPS
high	708 FPS	713 FPS
ultra	635 FPS	713 FPS
1440p
low	708 FPS	713 FPS
medium	683 FPS	713 FPS
high	589 FPS	658 FPS
ultra	515 FPS	573 FPS
4K
low	538 FPS	574 FPS
medium	489 FPS	511 FPS
high	435 FPS	456 FPS
ultra	381 FPS	394 FPS

Open Core i7-12700E Open Ryzen 7 7840HS

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700E and Ryzen 7 7840HS

Core i7-12700E

The Core i7-12700E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 28,302 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 7 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,538 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-12700E packs 12 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-12700E has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-12700E versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840HS — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i7-12700E uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7840HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700E scores 28,302 against the Ryzen 7 7840HS's 28,538 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 7840HS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 20,000 vs 16,854 (17.1% advantage for the Core i7-12700E). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,202 vs 1,962, a 11.5% lead for the Core i7-12700E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,981 vs 11,898 (0.7% advantage for the Core i7-12700E). L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700E vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840HS.

Feature	Core i7-12700E	Ryzen 7 7840HS
Cores / Threads	12 / 20+50%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz	5.1 GHz+6%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.8 GHz+81%
L3 Cache	25 MB (total)+56%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	4 nm-60%
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark	28,302	28,538
Cinebench R23 Multi	20,000+19%	16,854
Geekbench 6 Single	2,202+12%	1,962
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,981	11,898

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-12700E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7840HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 7840HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: R680E,Q670,H610E (Core i7-12700E) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 7840HS).

Feature	Core i7-12700E	Ryzen 7 7840HS
Socket	LGA1700	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200	LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	256 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 7840HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 7840HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-12700E) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 7840HS). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-12700E) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 7840HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-12700E targets Industrial Computing / Professional Desktop, Ryzen 7 7840HS targets High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700E rivals Ryzen 7 5800X; Ryzen 7 7840HS rivals Core i7-13700H.

Feature	Core i7-12700E	Ryzen 7 7840HS
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	Radeon 780M
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	AMD-V, SVM
Target Use	Industrial Computing / Professional Desktop	High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC