PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core 9 270H

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,500 vs 16,854).
❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.

Ryzen 7 7840HS

2023

Why buy it

✅+2.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 9 270H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).

Core 9 270H

2024

Ryzen 7 7840HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Why buy it

✅+2.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,500 vs 16,854).
❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 9 270H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core 9 270H better than Ryzen 7 7840HS?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core 9 270H is ahead with a 7.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 7840HS pulls ahead with 2.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core 9 270H also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 7840HS is the better fit. You are getting 2.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 9 270H still looks like the safer overall buy. Core 9 270H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 7.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 9 270H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core 9 270H Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 7840HS Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core 9 270H	Ryzen 7 7840HS
1080p
low	296 FPS	267 FPS
medium	272 FPS	242 FPS
high	226 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	192 FPS	176 FPS
1440p
low	241 FPS	235 FPS
medium	198 FPS	193 FPS
high	159 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	139 FPS
4K
low	168 FPS	163 FPS
medium	138 FPS	136 FPS
high	105 FPS	105 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	92 FPS

Open Core 9 270H Open Ryzen 7 7840HS

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core 9 270H	Ryzen 7 7840HS
1080p
low	720 FPS	495 FPS
medium	595 FPS	406 FPS
high	490 FPS	347 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	309 FPS
1440p
low	637 FPS	432 FPS
medium	539 FPS	374 FPS
high	445 FPS	320 FPS
ultra	374 FPS	272 FPS
4K
low	376 FPS	285 FPS
medium	324 FPS	258 FPS
high	299 FPS	242 FPS
ultra	258 FPS	208 FPS

Open Core 9 270H Open Ryzen 7 7840HS

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core 9 270H	Ryzen 7 7840HS
1080p
low	720 FPS	713 FPS
medium	720 FPS	713 FPS
high	719 FPS	713 FPS
ultra	617 FPS	624 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	713 FPS
medium	693 FPS	646 FPS
high	594 FPS	545 FPS
ultra	512 FPS	467 FPS
4K
low	607 FPS	544 FPS
medium	513 FPS	475 FPS
high	463 FPS	422 FPS
ultra	389 FPS	357 FPS

Open Core 9 270H Open Ryzen 7 7840HS

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core 9 270H	Ryzen 7 7840HS
1080p
low	720 FPS	713 FPS
medium	720 FPS	713 FPS
high	720 FPS	713 FPS
ultra	720 FPS	713 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	713 FPS
medium	720 FPS	713 FPS
high	720 FPS	658 FPS
ultra	636 FPS	573 FPS
4K
low	642 FPS	574 FPS
medium	570 FPS	511 FPS
high	510 FPS	456 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	394 FPS

Open Core 9 270H Open Ryzen 7 7840HS

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 9 270H and Ryzen 7 7840HS

Core 9 270H

The Core 9 270H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,793 points. Launch price was $697.

Ryzen 7 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,538 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 9 270H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core 9 270H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.8 GHz on the Core 9 270H versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840HS — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Core 9 270H (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core 9 270H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7840HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core 9 270H scores 28,793 against the Ryzen 7 7840HS's 28,538 — a 0.9% lead for the Core 9 270H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,500 vs 16,854 (2.1% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 1,962, a 35.2% lead for the Core 9 270H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,000 vs 11,898 (16.2% advantage for the Core 9 270H). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core 9 270H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840HS.

Feature	Core 9 270H	Ryzen 7 7840HS
Cores / Threads	14 / 20+75%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.8 GHz+14%	5.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	3.8 GHz+41%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)+50%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	4 nm-60%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark	28,793	28,538
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,500	16,854+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,800+43%	1,962
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,000+18%	11,898

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 9 270H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7840HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 7840HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 90.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Mobile platform (Core 9 270H) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 7840HS).

Feature	Core 9 270H	Ryzen 7 7840HS
Socket	FCBGA1744	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6400	LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity	96 GB	256 GB+167%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 7840HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core 9 270H) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 7840HS). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Xe Graphics (96 EUs) (Core 9 270H) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 7840HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 9 270H targets Extreme Gaming Laptop, Ryzen 7 7840HS targets High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC. Direct competitor: Core 9 270H rivals Ryzen 9 9900H; Ryzen 7 7840HS rivals Core i7-13700H.

Feature	Core 9 270H	Ryzen 7 7840HS
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel Xe Graphics (96 EUs)	Radeon 780M
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V, SVM
Target Use	Extreme Gaming Laptop	High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC