
Ryzen 5 7600X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7840H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+1.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Ryzen 7 7840H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
Ryzen 7 7840H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,832 vs 28,325).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Ryzen 7 7840H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Ryzen 7 7840H needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,832 vs 28,325).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7840H better than Ryzen 5 7600X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 7 7840H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 7 7840H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 524 FPS | 415 FPS |
| high | 436 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 318 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 455 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 388 FPS | 331 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 271 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 232 FPS | 215 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 7 7840H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 696 FPS |
| medium | 652 FPS | 696 FPS |
| high | 571 FPS | 696 FPS |
| ultra | 484 FPS | 650 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 696 FPS |
| medium | 554 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 548 FPS |
| ultra | 409 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 463 FPS | 534 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 281 FPS | 344 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 7 7840H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 696 FPS |
| medium | 708 FPS | 696 FPS |
| high | 708 FPS | 696 FPS |
| ultra | 708 FPS | 696 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 696 FPS |
| medium | 708 FPS | 696 FPS |
| high | 658 FPS | 696 FPS |
| ultra | 571 FPS | 631 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 502 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 391 FPS | 434 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7600X and Ryzen 7 7840H


Ryzen 5 7600X
Ryzen 5 7600X
The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 7840H
Ryzen 7 7840H
The Ryzen 7 7840H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 27,832 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7840H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 7840H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840H — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 4.7 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7840H uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7600X scores 28,325 against the Ryzen 7 7840H's 27,832 — a 1.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840H.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 7 7840H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+4% | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.7 GHz+24% | 3.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) | Phoenix (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 28,325+2% | 27,832 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,300 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,900 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,800 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7840H uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 7 7840H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X) / not specified (Ryzen 7 7840H). The Ryzen 5 7600X includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Ryzen 7 7840H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 7 7840H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












