Core i9-10940X vs Ryzen 7 7840H

Intel

Core i9-10940X

14 Cores28 Thrd165 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2019

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 7840H

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i9-10940X

2019

Why buy it

  • +20.3% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 16 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (27,684 vs 27,832).
  • Launch MSRP is still $784 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 371.4% higher power demand at 165W vs 35W.
  • Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840H moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Ryzen 7 7840H

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +15.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 35W instead of 165W, a 130W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 19 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 7840H better than Core i9-10940X?
Yes. Ryzen 7 7840H is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 15.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 7840H is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 15.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 7840H is the better fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 7840H is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i9-10940X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 7 7840H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $784 MSRP, and it gives you a 15.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i9-10940X is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (35.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 7840H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA2066, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 14/28. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i9-10940XRyzen 7 7840H
1080p
low279 FPS268 FPS
medium249 FPS241 FPS
high206 FPS206 FPS
ultra174 FPS176 FPS
1440p
low233 FPS234 FPS
medium189 FPS191 FPS
high154 FPS158 FPS
ultra134 FPS138 FPS
4K
low164 FPS160 FPS
medium134 FPS132 FPS
high105 FPS102 FPS
ultra90 FPS89 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i9-10940XRyzen 7 7840H
1080p
low550 FPS499 FPS
medium457 FPS415 FPS
high379 FPS358 FPS
ultra342 FPS318 FPS
1440p
low456 FPS437 FPS
medium394 FPS383 FPS
high332 FPS331 FPS
ultra287 FPS280 FPS
4K
low283 FPS290 FPS
medium246 FPS265 FPS
high226 FPS250 FPS
ultra197 FPS215 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i9-10940XRyzen 7 7840H
1080p
low692 FPS696 FPS
medium692 FPS696 FPS
high692 FPS696 FPS
ultra692 FPS650 FPS
1440p
low692 FPS696 FPS
medium692 FPS637 FPS
high692 FPS548 FPS
ultra656 FPS464 FPS
4K
low595 FPS534 FPS
medium500 FPS460 FPS
high444 FPS409 FPS
ultra373 FPS344 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i9-10940XRyzen 7 7840H
1080p
low692 FPS696 FPS
medium692 FPS696 FPS
high692 FPS696 FPS
ultra692 FPS696 FPS
1440p
low692 FPS696 FPS
medium692 FPS696 FPS
high639 FPS696 FPS
ultra560 FPS631 FPS
4K
low580 FPS619 FPS
medium516 FPS553 FPS
high464 FPS496 FPS
ultra408 FPS434 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-10940X and Ryzen 7 7840H

Intel

Core i9-10940X

The Core i9-10940X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,684 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 7 7840H

The Ryzen 7 7840H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 27,832 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i9-10940X packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7840H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-10940X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-10940X versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840H — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840H (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i9-10940X uses the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7840H uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10940X scores 27,684 against the Ryzen 7 7840H's 27,832 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 7840H. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-10940X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840H.

FeatureCore i9-10940XRyzen 7 7840H
Cores / Threads
14 / 28+75%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz
5.1 GHz+6%
Base Clock
3.3 GHz
3.8 GHz+15%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB (total)+20%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
4 nm-71%
Architecture
Cascade Lake-X (2019)
Phoenix (2023−2024)
PassMark
27,684
27,832
Cinebench R23 Multi
19,000
Geekbench 6 Single
1,450
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-10940X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 7840H uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i9-10940XRyzen 7 7840H
Socket
LGA2066
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
48
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10940X) / not specified (Ryzen 7 7840H). Primary use case: Core i9-10940X targets High-End Desktop.

FeatureCore i9-10940XRyzen 7 7840H
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
High-End Desktop