Core i7-13700T vs Ryzen 7 7840H

Intel

Core i7-13700T

16 Cores24 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 7840H

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700T

2023

Why buy it

  • +0.2% higher PassMark.
  • +87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 770, while Ryzen 7 7840H needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Launch MSRP is still $384 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Ryzen 7 7840H

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +29.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (27,832 vs 27,890).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700T better than Ryzen 7 7840H?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 7 7840H is ahead with a 29.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700T pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. Core i7-13700T also has the bigger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700T is the better fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-13700T is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700T is at an unclear MSRP at $384 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Ryzen 7 7840H is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 29.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (72.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-13700T is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i7-13700TRyzen 7 7840H
1080p
low264 FPS268 FPS
medium254 FPS241 FPS
high210 FPS206 FPS
ultra181 FPS176 FPS
1440p
low225 FPS234 FPS
medium193 FPS191 FPS
high153 FPS158 FPS
ultra135 FPS138 FPS
4K
low154 FPS160 FPS
medium131 FPS132 FPS
high101 FPS102 FPS
ultra90 FPS89 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i7-13700TRyzen 7 7840H
1080p
low311 FPS499 FPS
medium266 FPS415 FPS
high223 FPS358 FPS
ultra205 FPS318 FPS
1440p
low258 FPS437 FPS
medium228 FPS383 FPS
high197 FPS331 FPS
ultra172 FPS280 FPS
4K
low160 FPS290 FPS
medium143 FPS265 FPS
high134 FPS250 FPS
ultra119 FPS215 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i7-13700TRyzen 7 7840H
1080p
low647 FPS696 FPS
medium526 FPS696 FPS
high465 FPS696 FPS
ultra404 FPS650 FPS
1440p
low588 FPS696 FPS
medium484 FPS637 FPS
high423 FPS548 FPS
ultra368 FPS464 FPS
4K
low431 FPS534 FPS
medium370 FPS460 FPS
high332 FPS409 FPS
ultra283 FPS344 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i7-13700TRyzen 7 7840H
1080p
low697 FPS696 FPS
medium697 FPS696 FPS
high697 FPS696 FPS
ultra629 FPS696 FPS
1440p
low697 FPS696 FPS
medium685 FPS696 FPS
high592 FPS696 FPS
ultra516 FPS631 FPS
4K
low543 FPS619 FPS
medium492 FPS553 FPS
high438 FPS496 FPS
ultra382 FPS434 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700T and Ryzen 7 7840H

Intel

Core i7-13700T

The Core i7-13700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,890 points. Launch price was $384.

AMD

Ryzen 7 7840H

The Ryzen 7 7840H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 27,832 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700T packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7840H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13700T has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-13700T versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840H — a 4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840H (base: 1.4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i7-13700T uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7840H uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700T scores 27,890 against the Ryzen 7 7840H's 27,832 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-13700T. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700T vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840H.

FeatureCore i7-13700TRyzen 7 7840H
Cores / Threads
16 / 24+100%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz
5.1 GHz+4%
Base Clock
1.4 GHz
3.8 GHz+171%
L3 Cache
30 MB (total)+88%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Phoenix (2023−2024)
PassMark
27,890
27,832
Cinebench R23 Multi
11,611
Geekbench 6 Single
2,537
Geekbench 6 Multi
15,020
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7840H uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-13700TRyzen 7 7840H
Socket
LGA1700
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13700T) / not specified (Ryzen 7 7840H). The Core i7-13700T includes integrated graphics (UHD 770), while the Ryzen 7 7840H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-13700T targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700T rivals Ryzen 7 7700.

FeatureCore i7-13700TRyzen 7 7840H
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD 770
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming