
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Popular choices:

Xeon W-3275M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,000 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $4,449 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 740.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 9.1 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $4,449 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 205W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,293 vs 40,419).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3275M, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Xeon W-3275M
2019Why buy it
- ✅+17.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($4,449 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌70.8% higher power demand at 205W vs 120W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Xeon W-3275M
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,000 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $4,449 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 740.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 9.1 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $4,449 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 205W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+17.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,293 vs 40,419).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3275M, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($4,449 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌70.8% higher power demand at 205W vs 120W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than Xeon W-3275M?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Xeon W-3275M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Xeon W-3275M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 607 FPS |
| medium | 735 FPS | 522 FPS |
| high | 579 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 491 FPS | 371 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 715 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 607 FPS | 447 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 337 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 314 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 271 FPS | 213 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Xeon W-3275M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 1010 FPS |
| medium | 857 FPS | 928 FPS |
| high | 857 FPS | 876 FPS |
| ultra | 857 FPS | 793 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 808 FPS |
| medium | 851 FPS | 715 FPS |
| high | 786 FPS | 675 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 605 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 558 FPS | 519 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 429 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 315 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Xeon W-3275M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 1010 FPS |
| medium | 857 FPS | 1010 FPS |
| high | 857 FPS | 885 FPS |
| ultra | 782 FPS | 773 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 932 FPS |
| medium | 760 FPS | 804 FPS |
| high | 669 FPS | 702 FPS |
| ultra | 576 FPS | 603 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 618 FPS | 680 FPS |
| medium | 556 FPS | 591 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 521 FPS |
| ultra | 428 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Xeon W-3275M


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.

Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M
The Xeon W-3275M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 40,419 points. Launch price was $7,453.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-3275M offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon W-3275M has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3275M — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 4.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon W-3275M uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 34,293 against the Xeon W-3275M's 40,419 — a 16.4% lead for the Xeon W-3275M. L3 cache: 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs 38.5 MB on the Xeon W-3275M.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Xeon W-3275M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 28 / 56+250% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+9% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.4 GHz+76% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 96 MB (total)+149% | 38.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 28 MB+2700% |
| Process | 5 nm-64% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 34,293 | 40,419+18% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3275M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D versus 2933 on the Xeon W-3275M — the Xeon W-3275M supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3275M supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) vs 6 (Xeon W-3275M). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) vs 64 (Xeon W-3275M) — the Xeon W-3275M offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) and C620 (Xeon W-3275M).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Xeon W-3275M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | 2933+58560% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+6553500% | 2048 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 64+129% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3275M). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Xeon W-3275M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K; Xeon W-3275M rivals EPYC 7742.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Xeon W-3275M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D launched at $449 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3275M debuted at $4449. On MSRP ($449 vs $4449), the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is $4000 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 7800X3D delivers 76.4 pts/$ vs 9.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3275M — making the Ryzen 7 7800X3D the 157.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Xeon W-3275M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449-90% | $4449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 76.4+740% | 9.1 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












