
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2690 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +64.0% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,641 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $2,090 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 729.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 9.2 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $2,090 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 135W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2690 v4, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-2690 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅42.9% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,255 vs 34,293).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($2,090 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Xeon E5-2690 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +64.0% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,641 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $2,090 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 729.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 9.2 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $2,090 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 135W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅42.9% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2690 v4, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,255 vs 34,293).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($2,090 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than Xeon E5-2690 v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Xeon E5-2690 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Xeon E5-2690 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 364 FPS |
| medium | 737 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 580 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 722 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 611 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 398 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 396 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 315 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 273 FPS | 120 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Xeon E5-2690 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 481 FPS |
| medium | 857 FPS | 481 FPS |
| high | 857 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 857 FPS | 481 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 481 FPS |
| medium | 851 FPS | 481 FPS |
| high | 786 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 481 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 558 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 331 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 277 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Xeon E5-2690 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 481 FPS |
| medium | 857 FPS | 481 FPS |
| high | 857 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 782 FPS | 481 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 481 FPS |
| medium | 760 FPS | 481 FPS |
| high | 669 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 576 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 618 FPS | 481 FPS |
| medium | 556 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 416 FPS |
| ultra | 428 FPS | 358 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Xeon E5-2690 v4


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.

Xeon E5-2690 v4
Xeon E5-2690 v4
The Xeon E5-2690 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 19,255 points. Launch price was $2,090.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2690 v4 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-2690 v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2690 v4 — a 35.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 4.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon E5-2690 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 34,293 against the Xeon E5-2690 v4's 19,255 — a 56.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. L3 cache: 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2690 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Xeon E5-2690 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 14 / 28+75% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+43% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.4 GHz+69% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 96 MB (total)+174% | 35 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 3.5 MB+250% |
| Process | 5 nm-64% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 34,293+78% | 19,255 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2690 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D versus DDR4-2400 on the Xeon E5-2690 v4 — the Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2690 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2690 v4). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2690 v4) — the Xeon E5-2690 v4 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) and Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2690 v4).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Xeon E5-2690 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+25% | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1536 GB+1100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 40+43% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) / not specified (Xeon E5-2690 v4). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Xeon E5-2690 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Xeon E5-2690 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D launched at $449 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2690 v4 debuted at $2090. On MSRP ($449 vs $2090), the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is $1641 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 7800X3D delivers 76.4 pts/$ vs 9.2 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2690 v4 — making the Ryzen 7 7800X3D the 156.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Xeon E5-2690 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449-79% | $2090 |
| Performance per Dollar | 76.4+730% | 9.2 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












