
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +29.1% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌118.2% higher power demand at 120W vs 55W.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 120W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,500 vs 18,500).
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +29.1% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 120W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌118.2% higher power demand at 120W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,500 vs 18,500).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than Ryzen AI Max PRO 385?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 684 FPS |
| medium | 737 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 580 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 722 FPS | 591 FPS |
| medium | 611 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 398 FPS | 360 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 396 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 311 FPS |
| high | 315 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 273 FPS | 251 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 788 FPS |
| medium | 857 FPS | 788 FPS |
| high | 857 FPS | 706 FPS |
| ultra | 857 FPS | 594 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 788 FPS |
| medium | 851 FPS | 644 FPS |
| high | 786 FPS | 559 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 558 FPS | 562 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 338 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 788 FPS |
| medium | 857 FPS | 788 FPS |
| high | 857 FPS | 788 FPS |
| ultra | 782 FPS | 781 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 788 FPS |
| medium | 760 FPS | 768 FPS |
| high | 669 FPS | 673 FPS |
| ultra | 576 FPS | 590 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 618 FPS | 609 FPS |
| medium | 556 FPS | 541 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 428 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.


Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,508 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 — identical boost frequencies (base: 4.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 34,293 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385's 31,508 — a 8.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,500 vs 16,500 (11.4% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,700 vs 2,886, a 6.7% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,000 vs 14,136 (5.9% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D). L3 cache: 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.4 GHz+22% | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 96 MB (total)+200% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 34,293+9% | 31,508 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,500+12% | 16,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,700 | 2,886+7% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,000+6% | 14,136 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) vs 8 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) vs 20 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385) — the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) and Strix Halo platform (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | LPDDR5x-8000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+40% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) and Radeon 8050S (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming, Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 targets Enterprise AI Mobile. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K; Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 rivals M3 Max.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) | Radeon 8050S |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | Enterprise AI Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












