
Ryzen 7 2700
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 2700
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 13 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,633 vs 34,293).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 52.3 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +35.6% higher average FPS across 13 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 46.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 52.3 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Ryzen 7 2700 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌50.2% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 2700
2018Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +35.6% higher average FPS across 13 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 46.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 52.3 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Ryzen 7 2700 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 13 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,633 vs 34,293).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 52.3 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌50.2% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than Ryzen 7 2700?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 2700 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 2700 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 336 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 735 FPS |
| high | 265 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 491 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 715 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 607 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 396 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 337 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 314 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 271 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 2700 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 391 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 391 FPS | 857 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 857 FPS |
| ultra | 391 FPS | 857 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 391 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 391 FPS | 851 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 786 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 388 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 319 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 362 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 2700 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 391 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 391 FPS | 857 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 857 FPS |
| ultra | 391 FPS | 782 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 391 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 391 FPS | 760 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 669 FPS |
| ultra | 391 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 391 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 391 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 384 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 428 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 2700 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D


Ryzen 7 2700
Ryzen 7 2700
The Ryzen 7 2700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 15,633 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 2700 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 2700 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — a 19.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 3.2 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Ryzen 7 2700 uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 2700 scores 15,633 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 74.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 2700 vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz | 5 GHz+22% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz+38% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 96 MB (total)+500% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 12 nm | 5 nm-58% |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 15,633 | 34,293+119% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 2700 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 2700) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Ryzen 7 2700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 2700 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D debuted at $449. On MSRP ($299 vs $449), the Ryzen 7 2700 is $150 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 2700 delivers 52.3 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — making the Ryzen 7 7800X3D the 37.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-33% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.3 | 76.4+46% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












