
Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 120W, a 92W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,408 vs 34,293).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +36.0% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 28W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS
2024Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 120W, a 92W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +36.0% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,408 vs 34,293).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 28W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 737 FPS |
| high | 278 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 722 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 611 FPS |
| high | 251 FPS | 500 FPS |
| ultra | 212 FPS | 398 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 273 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 535 FPS | 857 FPS |
| high | 535 FPS | 857 FPS |
| ultra | 535 FPS | 857 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 535 FPS | 851 FPS |
| high | 511 FPS | 786 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 415 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 355 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 293 FPS | 362 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 535 FPS | 857 FPS |
| high | 535 FPS | 857 FPS |
| ultra | 535 FPS | 782 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 535 FPS | 760 FPS |
| high | 535 FPS | 669 FPS |
| ultra | 535 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 531 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 411 FPS | 428 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS and Ryzen 7 7800X3D


Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS
Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS
The Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,408 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 3.5 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS scores 21,408 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 46.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4.4 GHz+26% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 96 MB (total)+500% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point (2024−2025) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 21,408 | 34,293+60% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











