PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9565

2024

Why buy it

✅+294.3% higher PassMark.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 96 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 72 cores / 144 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.9 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($10,486 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 400W vs 120W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 7 7800X3D

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +38.5% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $10,037 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $10,486 MSRP).
✅Delivers 492.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 12.9 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $10,486 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 400W, a 280W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 9565 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (34,293 vs 135,221).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 384 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9565, which brings 72 cores / 144 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 9565

2024

Ryzen 7 7800X3D

2023

Why buy it

✅+294.3% higher PassMark.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 96 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 72 cores / 144 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +38.5% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $10,037 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $10,486 MSRP).
✅Delivers 492.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 12.9 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $10,486 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 400W, a 280W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 9565 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.9 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($10,486 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 400W vs 120W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (34,293 vs 135,221).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 384 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9565, which brings 72 cores / 144 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9565 better than Ryzen 7 7800X3D?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 9565 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9565 is the better fit. You are getting 294.3% better PassMark, backed by 72 cores and 144 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 96 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9565 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 7800X3D makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 9565 is 2235.4% more expensive on MSRP at $10,486 MSRP versus $449 MSRP, and it gives you 294.3% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Ryzen 7 7800X3D is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 38.5% average FPS lead across 7 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 7800X3D is also 492.3% better value on MSRP (76.4 vs 12.9 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9565 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023), 300% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 96 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 72 cores / 144 threads instead of 8/16. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9565 Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 7800X3D Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9565	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
1080p
low	171 FPS	266 FPS
medium	142 FPS	247 FPS
high	121 FPS	211 FPS
ultra	98 FPS	186 FPS
1440p
low	150 FPS	258 FPS
medium	120 FPS	215 FPS
high	98 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	154 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	179 FPS
medium	69 FPS	149 FPS
high	55 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	100 FPS

Open EPYC 9565 Open Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9565	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
1080p
low	583 FPS	857 FPS
medium	511 FPS	737 FPS
high	415 FPS	580 FPS
ultra	361 FPS	493 FPS
1440p
low	492 FPS	722 FPS
medium	439 FPS	611 FPS
high	367 FPS	500 FPS
ultra	302 FPS	398 FPS
4K
low	306 FPS	396 FPS
medium	276 FPS	339 FPS
high	249 FPS	315 FPS
ultra	222 FPS	273 FPS

Open EPYC 9565 Open Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9565	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
1080p
low	747 FPS	857 FPS
medium	634 FPS	857 FPS
high	575 FPS	857 FPS
ultra	506 FPS	857 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	857 FPS
medium	474 FPS	851 FPS
high	423 FPS	786 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	405 FPS	558 FPS
medium	324 FPS	479 FPS
high	286 FPS	427 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	362 FPS

Open EPYC 9565 Open Ryzen 7 7800X3D

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9565	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
1080p
low	969 FPS	857 FPS
medium	875 FPS	857 FPS
high	752 FPS	857 FPS
ultra	676 FPS	782 FPS
1440p
low	780 FPS	857 FPS
medium	683 FPS	760 FPS
high	583 FPS	669 FPS
ultra	513 FPS	576 FPS
4K
low	551 FPS	618 FPS
medium	496 FPS	556 FPS
high	434 FPS	495 FPS
ultra	380 FPS	428 FPS

Open EPYC 9565 Open Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9565 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D

EPYC 9565

The EPYC 9565 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 72 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 3.15 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 135,221 points. Launch price was $10,486.

Ryzen 7 7800X3D

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9565 packs 72 cores / 144 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 9565 has 64 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9565 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 3.15 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The EPYC 9565 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9565 scores 135,221 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 119.1% lead for the EPYC 9565. L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9565 vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Feature	EPYC 9565	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Cores / Threads	72 / 144+800%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	5 GHz+16%
Base Clock	3.15 GHz	4.4 GHz+40%
L3 Cache	384 MB (total)+300%	96 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-20%	5 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
PassMark	135,221+294%	34,293
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	18,500
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,700
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	15,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9565 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9565) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9565) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) — the EPYC 9565 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9565) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D).

Feature	EPYC 9565	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Socket	SP5	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+4700%	128 GB
RAM Channels	12+500%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+357%	28

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9565) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the EPYC 9565 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 9565 targets Data Center / Cloud Computing, Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 9565 rivals Xeon 6972P; Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.

Feature	EPYC 9565	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	AMD-V
Target Use	Data Center / Cloud Computing	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9565 launched at $10486 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D debuted at $449. On MSRP ($10486 vs $449), the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is $10037 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9565 delivers 12.9 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — making the Ryzen 7 7800X3D the 142.2% better value option.