
EPYC 7401
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7401
2017Why buy it
- ✅+61.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 36.9 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌29.2% higher power demand at 155W vs 120W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +75.5% higher average FPS across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,051 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 107.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 36.9 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 155W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,293 vs 55,280).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7401, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 7401
2017Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅+61.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +75.5% higher average FPS across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,051 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 107.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 36.9 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 155W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 36.9 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌29.2% higher power demand at 155W vs 120W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,293 vs 55,280).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7401, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than EPYC 7401?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7401 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7401 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 737 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 722 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 611 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 500 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 398 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 273 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7401 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 620 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 857 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 857 FPS |
| ultra | 399 FPS | 857 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 517 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 851 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 786 FPS |
| ultra | 325 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 362 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7401 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 834 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 758 FPS | 857 FPS |
| high | 651 FPS | 857 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 782 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 667 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 584 FPS | 760 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 669 FPS |
| ultra | 420 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 320 FPS | 428 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7401 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D

EPYC 7401
EPYC 7401
The EPYC 7401 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 55,280 points. Launch price was $1,850.


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7401 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7401 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7401 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — a 50% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 2 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The EPYC 7401 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7401 scores 55,280 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 46.9% lead for the EPYC 7401. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7401 vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| Feature | EPYC 7401 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+200% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 5 GHz+67% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 4.4 GHz+120% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 96 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Naples (2017−2018) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 55,280+61% | 34,293 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7401 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the EPYC 7401 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — the EPYC 7401 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7401 supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7401) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7401) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) — the EPYC 7401 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7401) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D).
| Feature | EPYC 7401 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666+53220% | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 | 128 GB+6553500% |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7401) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the EPYC 7401 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 7401 rivals Xeon Silver 4114; Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | EPYC 7401 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7401 launched at $1500 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D debuted at $449. On MSRP ($1500 vs $449), the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is $1051 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7401 delivers 36.9 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — making the Ryzen 7 7800X3D the 69.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7401 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1500 | $449-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.9 | 76.4+107% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












