
Core i9-14900F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-14900F
2024Why buy it
- ✅+82.8% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Delivers 17.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.4 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($524 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌16.7% HIGHER MSRP$524 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +36.0% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $75 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Core i9-14900F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,500 vs 33,820).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 76.4 vs 89.4 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
Core i9-14900F
2024Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅+82.8% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Delivers 17.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.4 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($524 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +36.0% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $75 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Core i9-14900F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌16.7% HIGHER MSRP$524 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,500 vs 33,820).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 76.4 vs 89.4 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-14900F better than Ryzen 7 7800X3D?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-14900F | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-14900F | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 436 FPS | 737 FPS |
| high | 355 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 314 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 722 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 611 FPS |
| high | 317 FPS | 500 FPS |
| ultra | 258 FPS | 398 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 273 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-14900F | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 760 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 624 FPS | 857 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 857 FPS |
| ultra | 465 FPS | 857 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 680 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 567 FPS | 851 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 786 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 439 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 334 FPS | 362 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-14900F | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 990 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 886 FPS | 857 FPS |
| high | 774 FPS | 857 FPS |
| ultra | 688 FPS | 782 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 821 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 723 FPS | 760 FPS |
| high | 631 FPS | 669 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 606 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 421 FPS | 428 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-14900F and Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Core i9-14900F
Core i9-14900F
The Core i9-14900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,825 points. Launch price was $524.


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The Core i9-14900F packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-14900F has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the Core i9-14900F versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — a 11.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900F (base: 2 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Core i9-14900F uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14900F scores 46,825 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 30.9% lead for the Core i9-14900F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 33,820 vs 18,500 (58.6% advantage for the Core i9-14900F). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14900F vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| Feature | Core i9-14900F | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+200% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.6 GHz+12% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 4.4 GHz+120% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 96 MB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 46,825+37% | 34,293 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 33,820+83% | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-14900F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i9-14900F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14900F) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) — the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i9-14900F) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D).
| Feature | Core i9-14900F | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-14900F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Core i9-14900F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | Core i9-14900F | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-14900F launched at $524 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D debuted at $449. On MSRP ($524 vs $449), the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is $75 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-14900F delivers 89.4 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — making the Core i9-14900F the 15.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-14900F | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $524 | $449-14% |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.4+17% | 76.4 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












