
Core i9-13900T
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-13900T
2023Why buy it
- ✅+24.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌22.3% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.8% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,293 vs 42,735).
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
Core i9-13900T
2023Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅+24.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.8% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌22.3% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,293 vs 42,735).
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900T better than Ryzen 7 7800X3D?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900T | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 311 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900T | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 350 FPS | 737 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 252 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 722 FPS |
| medium | 306 FPS | 611 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 500 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 398 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 273 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-13900T | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 761 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 625 FPS | 857 FPS |
| high | 542 FPS | 857 FPS |
| ultra | 466 FPS | 857 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 677 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 851 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 786 FPS |
| ultra | 421 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 495 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 362 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-13900T | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1004 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 897 FPS | 857 FPS |
| high | 785 FPS | 857 FPS |
| ultra | 698 FPS | 782 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 833 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 733 FPS | 760 FPS |
| high | 640 FPS | 669 FPS |
| ultra | 562 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 550 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 428 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900T and Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Core i9-13900T
Core i9-13900T
The Core i9-13900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 42,735 points. Launch price was $549.


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900T packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-13900T has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core i9-13900T versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — a 5.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900T (base: 1.1 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Core i9-13900T uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900T scores 42,735 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 21.9% lead for the Core i9-13900T. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900T vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| Feature | Core i9-13900T | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+200% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+6% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 4.4 GHz+300% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 96 MB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 42,735+25% | 34,293 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i9-13900T versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — the Core i9-13900T supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-13900T supports up to 192 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900T) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) — the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Raptor Lake-HX (Core i9-13900T) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D).
| Feature | Core i9-13900T | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+111900% | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 | 128 GB+69904967% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900T) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics (Core i9-13900T) and AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i9-13900T rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX; Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | Core i9-13900T | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-13900T launched at $549 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D debuted at $449. On MSRP ($549 vs $449), the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is $100 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900T delivers 77.8 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — making the Core i9-13900T the 1.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13900T | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549 | $449-18% |
| Performance per Dollar | 77.8+2% | 76.4 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












