PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i9-13900H

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,444 vs 34,293).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.5 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($617 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 7 7800X3D

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +38.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $168 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
✅Delivers 71.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 44.5 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Core i9-13900H needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.

Core i9-13900H

2023

Ryzen 7 7800X3D

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +38.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $168 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
✅Delivers 71.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 44.5 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Core i9-13900H needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,444 vs 34,293).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.5 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($617 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than Core i9-13900H?

Yes. Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 38.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 25% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 38.4% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 96 MB vs 24 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the better fit. You are getting 25% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (96 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 7800X3D is $168 cheaper on MSRP at $449 MSRP versus $617 MSRP, and it gives you a 38.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 71.7% better value on MSRP (76.4 vs 44.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 3D V-Cache and a much larger 96 MB L3 cache instead of 24 MB and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 14/20. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i9-13900H Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 7800X3D Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i9-13900H	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
1080p
low	262 FPS	266 FPS
medium	253 FPS	247 FPS
high	210 FPS	211 FPS
ultra	180 FPS	186 FPS
1440p
low	223 FPS	258 FPS
medium	192 FPS	215 FPS
high	154 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	154 FPS
4K
low	154 FPS	179 FPS
medium	132 FPS	149 FPS
high	101 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	100 FPS

Open Core i9-13900H Open Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i9-13900H	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
1080p
low	636 FPS	857 FPS
medium	543 FPS	735 FPS
high	458 FPS	579 FPS
ultra	417 FPS	491 FPS
1440p
low	554 FPS	715 FPS
medium	492 FPS	607 FPS
high	416 FPS	497 FPS
ultra	357 FPS	396 FPS
4K
low	325 FPS	393 FPS
medium	296 FPS	337 FPS
high	279 FPS	314 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	271 FPS

Open Core i9-13900H Open Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i9-13900H	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
1080p
low	648 FPS	857 FPS
medium	530 FPS	857 FPS
high	467 FPS	857 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	857 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	857 FPS
medium	491 FPS	851 FPS
high	427 FPS	786 FPS
ultra	370 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	558 FPS
medium	374 FPS	479 FPS
high	339 FPS	427 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	362 FPS

Open Core i9-13900H Open Ryzen 7 7800X3D

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i9-13900H	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
1080p
low	686 FPS	857 FPS
medium	686 FPS	857 FPS
high	686 FPS	857 FPS
ultra	672 FPS	782 FPS
1440p
low	686 FPS	857 FPS
medium	686 FPS	760 FPS
high	626 FPS	669 FPS
ultra	552 FPS	576 FPS
4K
low	555 FPS	618 FPS
medium	504 FPS	556 FPS
high	451 FPS	495 FPS
ultra	394 FPS	428 FPS

Open Core i9-13900H Open Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900H and Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Core i9-13900H

The Core i9-13900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,444 points. Launch price was $617.

Ryzen 7 7800X3D

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-13900H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900H versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Core i9-13900H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900H scores 27,444 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 22.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900H vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Feature	Core i9-13900H	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Cores / Threads	14 / 20+75%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+8%	5 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	4.4 GHz+69%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	96 MB (total)+300%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
PassMark	27,444	34,293+25%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	18,500
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,700
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	15,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i9-13900H	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Socket	FCBGA1744	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	—	128 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	28

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-13900H) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Core i9-13900H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.

Feature	Core i9-13900H	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Integrated GPU	—	Yes
IGPU Model	—	AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i9-13900H launched at $617 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D debuted at $449. On MSRP ($617 vs $449), the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is $168 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900H delivers 44.5 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — making the Ryzen 7 7800X3D the 52.8% better value option.