
Core i9-10920X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-10920X
2019Why buy it
- ✅57.1% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,458 vs 18,500).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.6 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($689 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌37.5% higher power demand at 165W vs 120W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.3% higher average FPS across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $240 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $689 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 103.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 37.6 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $689 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 165W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i9-10920X
2019Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅57.1% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.3% higher average FPS across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $240 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $689 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 103.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 37.6 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $689 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 165W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,458 vs 18,500).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.6 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($689 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌37.5% higher power demand at 165W vs 120W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than Core i9-10920X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-10920X | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-10920X | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 459 FPS | 737 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 345 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 722 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 611 FPS |
| high | 334 FPS | 500 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 398 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 288 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 273 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-10920X | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 857 FPS |
| high | 616 FPS | 857 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 857 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 851 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 786 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 522 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 320 FPS | 362 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-10920X | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 857 FPS |
| high | 647 FPS | 857 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 782 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 760 FPS |
| high | 647 FPS | 669 FPS |
| ultra | 587 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 609 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 428 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-10920X and Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Core i9-10920X
Core i9-10920X
The Core i9-10920X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 25,875 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10920X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-10920X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-10920X versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 3.5 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Core i9-10920X uses the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10920X scores 25,875 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 28% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,458 vs 18,500 (17.9% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,250 vs 2,700, a 73.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,000 vs 15,000 (22.2% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D). L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-10920X vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| Feature | Core i9-10920X | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4.4 GHz+26% |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB (total) | 96 MB (total)+399% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake-X (2019) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 25,875 | 34,293+33% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,458 | 18,500+20% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,250 | 2,700+116% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,000 | 15,000+25% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10920X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10920X versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — the Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-10920X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Core i9-10920X) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). PCIe lanes: 44 (Core i9-10920X) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) — the Core i9-10920X offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X299 (Core i9-10920X) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D).
| Feature | Core i9-10920X | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR5-5200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 44+57% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-10920X) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Core i9-10920X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-10920X targets HEDT/Workstation, Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | Core i9-10920X | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | HEDT/Workstation | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-10920X launched at $689 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D debuted at $449. On MSRP ($689 vs $449), the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is $240 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10920X delivers 37.6 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — making the Ryzen 7 7800X3D the 68.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-10920X | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $689 | $449-35% |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.6 | 76.4+103% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












