
Core i9-9900X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7736U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-9900X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20.3% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅120% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $989 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7736U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1000% higher power demand at 165W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7736U moves to FP7 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7736U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7736U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 165W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Core i9-9900X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,768 vs 13,985).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 19 MB).
Core i9-9900X
2018Ryzen 7 7736U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20.3% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅120% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 165W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Core i9-9900X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $989 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7736U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1000% higher power demand at 165W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7736U moves to FP7 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7736U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,768 vs 13,985).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 19 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-9900X better than Ryzen 7 7736U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 7 7736U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 7 7736U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 316 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 281 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 384 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 279 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 185 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 7 7736U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 542 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 542 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 527 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 542 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 7 7736U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 542 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 542 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 542 FPS |
| ultra | 541 FPS | 542 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 542 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 542 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 542 FPS |
| ultra | 541 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 431 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 372 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-9900X and Ryzen 7 7736U

Core i9-9900X
Core i9-9900X
The Core i9-9900X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 21,655 points. Launch price was $989.


Ryzen 7 7736U
Ryzen 7 7736U
The Ryzen 7 7736U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 21,696 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-9900X packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7736U offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-9900X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i9-9900X versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7736U — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7736U (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i9-9900X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7736U uses Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9900X scores 21,655 against the Ryzen 7 7736U's 21,696 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 7736U. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 13,985 vs 12,768 (9.1% advantage for the Core i9-9900X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,459 vs 1,869, a 24.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 7736U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,475 vs 8,020 (16.6% advantage for the Core i9-9900X). L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-9900X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7736U.
| Feature | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 7 7736U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.7 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+30% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB (total)+20% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 6 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 21,655 | 21,696 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 13,985+10% | 12,768 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,459 | 1,869+28% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,475+18% | 8,020 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-9900X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 7736U uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i9-9900X versus LPDDR5-6400 on the Ryzen 7 7736U — the Ryzen 7 7736U supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-9900X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Core i9-9900X) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 7736U). PCIe lanes: 44 (Core i9-9900X) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 7736U) — the Core i9-9900X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X299 (Core i9-9900X) and SoC (Ryzen 7 7736U).
| Feature | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 7 7736U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | LPDDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 44+120% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-9900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i9-9900X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-9900X) vs AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 7 7736U). The Ryzen 7 7736U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Core i9-9900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7736U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7736U rivals Core i7-1255U.
| Feature | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 7 7736U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V (SVM) |
| Target Use | — | Productivity |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












