
Core i7-13620H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7735H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13620H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Ryzen 7 7735H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13620H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,619 vs 23,804).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Core i7-13620H
2023Ryzen 7 7735H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13620H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,619 vs 23,804).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13620H better than Ryzen 7 7735H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13620H | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 293 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 241 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13620H | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 384 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 538 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 325 FPS | 238 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 333 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 179 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13620H | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 595 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 595 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 595 FPS | 387 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 595 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 587 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 507 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 494 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 261 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13620H | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 595 FPS | 590 FPS |
| high | 595 FPS | 590 FPS |
| ultra | 595 FPS | 590 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 595 FPS | 590 FPS |
| high | 595 FPS | 587 FPS |
| ultra | 595 FPS | 510 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 502 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 376 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13620H and Ryzen 7 7735H

Core i7-13620H
Core i7-13620H
The Core i7-13620H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 23,804 points. Launch price was $502.


Ryzen 7 7735H
Ryzen 7 7735H
The Ryzen 7 7735H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.75 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 23,619 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13620H packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7735H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13620H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-13620H versus 4.75 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7735H — a 3.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-13620H (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-13620H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7735H uses Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13620H scores 23,804 against the Ryzen 7 7735H's 23,619 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i7-13620H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13620H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7735H.
| Feature | Core i7-13620H | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+3% | 4.75 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz+33% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 6 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) |
| PassMark | 23,804 | 23,619 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,176 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,859 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,766 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13620H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 7735H uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Core i7-13620H supports up to 96 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Core i7-13620H | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB+50% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-13620H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i7-13620H supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13620H) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7735H). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics (64EU) (Core i7-13620H) and Radeon 680M (Ryzen 7 7735H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7735H targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core i7-13620H | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics (64EU) | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











