
Core Ultra 7 255U
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7730U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 7 255U
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 14W instead of 15W, a 1W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 7 7730U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 255U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,748 vs 17,834).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 255U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Core Ultra 7 255U
2025Ryzen 7 7730U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 14W instead of 15W, a 1W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 255U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,748 vs 17,834).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 255U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 7 255U better than Ryzen 7 7730U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 255U | Ryzen 7 7730U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 256 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 255U | Ryzen 7 7730U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 446 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 399 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 348 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 445 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 285 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 265 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 100 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 255U | Ryzen 7 7730U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 446 FPS | 444 FPS |
| medium | 446 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 446 FPS | 444 FPS |
| ultra | 446 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 446 FPS | 444 FPS |
| medium | 446 FPS | 431 FPS |
| high | 446 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 446 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 446 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 446 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 446 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 218 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 255U | Ryzen 7 7730U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 446 FPS | 444 FPS |
| medium | 446 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 446 FPS | 444 FPS |
| ultra | 446 FPS | 444 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 446 FPS | 444 FPS |
| medium | 446 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 446 FPS | 444 FPS |
| ultra | 446 FPS | 444 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 446 FPS | 444 FPS |
| medium | 446 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 446 FPS | 402 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 344 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 255U and Ryzen 7 7730U

Core Ultra 7 255U
Core Ultra 7 255U
The Core Ultra 7 255U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 14 MB + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,834 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 7730U
Ryzen 7 7730U
The Ryzen 7 7730U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-U Refresh (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,748 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 255U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7730U offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 7 255U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 255U versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7730U — a 14.4% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255U (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 255U uses the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7730U uses Barcelo-U Refresh (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 255U scores 17,834 against the Ryzen 7 7730U's 17,748 — a 0.5% lead for the Core Ultra 7 255U. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Core Ultra 7 255U vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7730U.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 255U | Ryzen 7 7730U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 14+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+16% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+90% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | — | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-U (2025) | Barcelo-U Refresh (2023) |
| PassMark | 17,834 | 17,748 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 255U uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7730U uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 255U | Ryzen 7 7730U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












