Core Ultra 7 258V vs Ryzen 7 7445HS

Intel

Core Ultra 7 258V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 7445HS

6 Cores12 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 7 258V

2024

Why buy it

  • Draws 17W instead of 35W, a 18W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of FP7/FP7r2 and older memory support.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Arc 140V, while Ryzen 7 7445HS needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (18,947 vs 19,008).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $450 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7445HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Ryzen 7 7445HS

2023

Why buy it

  • +0.3% higher PassMark.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 105.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 17W.
  • Older platform position on FP7/FP7r2, while Core Ultra 7 258V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 258V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 7 258V better than Ryzen 7 7445HS?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core Ultra 7 258V is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 7445HS pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. Ryzen 7 7445HS also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 7445HS is the better fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 7 258V is the smarter buy today. Core Ultra 7 258V is at an unclear MSRP at $450 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Ryzen 7 7445HS is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (42.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 258V is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and a healthier platform with FCBGA2833 and DDR5 instead of FP7/FP7r2. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore Ultra 7 258VRyzen 7 7445HS
1080p
low272 FPS177 FPS
medium243 FPS144 FPS
high205 FPS117 FPS
ultra176 FPS95 FPS
1440p
low230 FPS151 FPS
medium185 FPS121 FPS
high152 FPS97 FPS
ultra134 FPS80 FPS
4K
low161 FPS85 FPS
medium130 FPS74 FPS
high101 FPS59 FPS
ultra89 FPS46 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore Ultra 7 258VRyzen 7 7445HS
1080p
low217 FPS458 FPS
medium179 FPS362 FPS
high161 FPS314 FPS
ultra142 FPS268 FPS
1440p
low184 FPS392 FPS
medium157 FPS321 FPS
high145 FPS286 FPS
ultra125 FPS240 FPS
4K
low141 FPS295 FPS
medium124 FPS247 FPS
high117 FPS225 FPS
ultra102 FPS187 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore Ultra 7 258VRyzen 7 7445HS
1080p
low474 FPS475 FPS
medium474 FPS475 FPS
high474 FPS475 FPS
ultra474 FPS475 FPS
1440p
low474 FPS475 FPS
medium474 FPS475 FPS
high474 FPS475 FPS
ultra468 FPS443 FPS
4K
low474 FPS475 FPS
medium462 FPS439 FPS
high404 FPS374 FPS
ultra336 FPS308 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore Ultra 7 258VRyzen 7 7445HS
1080p
low474 FPS475 FPS
medium474 FPS475 FPS
high474 FPS475 FPS
ultra474 FPS475 FPS
1440p
low474 FPS475 FPS
medium474 FPS475 FPS
high474 FPS475 FPS
ultra474 FPS475 FPS
4K
low474 FPS475 FPS
medium474 FPS475 FPS
high474 FPS436 FPS
ultra418 FPS371 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 258V and Ryzen 7 7445HS

Intel

Core Ultra 7 258V

The Core Ultra 7 258V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,947 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 7 7445HS

The Ryzen 7 7445HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 19,008 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 258V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7445HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 7 258V has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 258V versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7445HS — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 258V (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 258V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7445HS uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 258V scores 18,947 against the Ryzen 7 7445HS's 19,008 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 7445HS. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 258V vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 7445HS.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 258VRyzen 7 7445HS
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz+2%
4.7 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3.2 GHz+45%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
16 MB+33%
L2 Cache
2.5 MB (per core)
6 MB+140%
Process
3 nm-25%
4 nm
Architecture
Lunar Lake (2024)
Phoenix (2023−2024)
PassMark
18,947
19,008
Cinebench R23 Multi
10,000
Geekbench 6 Single
2,750
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 258V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 7445HS uses FP7/FP7r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 258VRyzen 7 7445HS
Socket
FCBGA2833
FP7/FP7r2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5X-8533
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 258V) / not specified (Ryzen 7 7445HS). The Core Ultra 7 258V includes integrated graphics (Arc 140V), while the Ryzen 7 7445HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 258V targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 258V rivals Ryzen 7 8840U.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 258VRyzen 7 7445HS
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Arc 140V
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming