
Core i9-10900
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7445HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-10900
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $483 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7445HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Ryzen 7 7445HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10900 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,008 vs 19,163).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
Core i9-10900
2020Ryzen 7 7445HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $483 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7445HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10900 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,008 vs 19,163).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-10900 better than Ryzen 7 7445HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-10900 | Ryzen 7 7445HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-10900 | Ryzen 7 7445HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 454 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 314 FPS |
| ultra | 479 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 388 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 452 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 454 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 385 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 310 FPS | 187 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-10900 | Ryzen 7 7445HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 479 FPS | 475 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 461 FPS | 443 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 417 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 308 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-10900 | Ryzen 7 7445HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 479 FPS | 475 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 479 FPS | 475 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 371 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-10900 and Ryzen 7 7445HS

Core i9-10900
Core i9-10900
The Core i9-10900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 19,163 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 7445HS
Ryzen 7 7445HS
The Ryzen 7 7445HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 19,008 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10900 packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7445HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-10900 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-10900 versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7445HS — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i9-10900 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7445HS uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10900 scores 19,163 against the Ryzen 7 7445HS's 19,008 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i9-10900. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900 vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 7445HS.
| Feature | Core i9-10900 | Ryzen 7 7445HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+9% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.2 GHz+14% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+25% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 6 MB+2300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Phoenix (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 19,163 | 19,008 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10900 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 7445HS uses FP7/FP7r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-10900 | Ryzen 7 7445HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FP7/FP7r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













