
Core i5-13600H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7435HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while Ryzen 7 7435HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 7 7435HS
2023Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,101 vs 23,291).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-13600H
2023Ryzen 7 7435HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while Ryzen 7 7435HS needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,101 vs 23,291).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600H better than Ryzen 7 7435HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600H | Ryzen 7 7435HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 291 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600H | Ryzen 7 7435HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 544 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 446 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 402 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 469 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 393 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 195 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600H | Ryzen 7 7435HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 578 FPS |
| medium | 582 FPS | 495 FPS |
| high | 582 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 582 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 582 FPS | 440 FPS |
| high | 582 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 507 FPS | 333 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 325 FPS |
| high | 445 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 230 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600H | Ryzen 7 7435HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 578 FPS |
| medium | 582 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 582 FPS | 578 FPS |
| ultra | 582 FPS | 578 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 578 FPS |
| medium | 582 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 582 FPS | 568 FPS |
| ultra | 582 FPS | 495 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 510 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 502 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 433 FPS | 364 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600H and Ryzen 7 7435HS

Core i5-13600H
Core i5-13600H
The Core i5-13600H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 23,291 points. Launch price was $311.


Ryzen 7 7435HS
Ryzen 7 7435HS
The Ryzen 7 7435HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt R (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 23,101 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7435HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13600H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-13600H versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7435HS — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600H (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-13600H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7435HS uses Rembrandt R (2025) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600H scores 23,291 against the Ryzen 7 7435HS's 23,101 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-13600H. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-13600H vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 7435HS.
| Feature | Core i5-13600H | Ryzen 7 7435HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+7% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.1 GHz+11% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 4 MB+100% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 6 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Rembrandt R (2025) |
| PassMark | 23,291 | 23,101 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,857 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,423 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,684 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7435HS uses FP7r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13600H | Ryzen 7 7435HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FP7r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13600H) / not specified (Ryzen 7 7435HS). The Core i5-13600H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 80EU), while the Ryzen 7 7435HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600H targets High performance laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13600H rivals Ryzen 7 7840HS.
| Feature | Core i5-13600H | Ryzen 7 7435HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | High performance laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












