
EPYC 9355P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9355P
2024Why buy it
- ✅+250.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.4 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($2,998 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,549 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $2,998 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 90.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $2,998 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 280W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 97,249).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9355P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9355P moves to SP5 and DDR5.
EPYC 9355P
2024Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+250.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,549 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $2,998 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 90.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $2,998 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 280W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.4 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($2,998 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 97,249).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9355P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9355P moves to SP5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9355P better than Ryzen 7 5800X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9355P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9355P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 459 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 397 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 563 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 404 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 333 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 250 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9355P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 752 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 638 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 593 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9355P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1018 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 914 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 788 FPS | 693 FPS |
| ultra | 711 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 813 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 707 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 606 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 535 FPS | 593 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 577 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 512 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 449 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 436 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9355P and Ryzen 7 5800X

EPYC 9355P
EPYC 9355P
The EPYC 9355P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.55 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 97,249 points. Launch price was $2,998.


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9355P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 9355P has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9355P versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 6.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X (base: 3.55 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 9355P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9355P scores 97,249 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 111.3% lead for the EPYC 9355P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9355P vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | EPYC 9355P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+300% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.7 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.55 GHz | 3.8 GHz+7% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+700% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 97,249+251% | 27,712 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9355P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9355P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5800X — the EPYC 9355P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 5800X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9355P) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 5800X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9355P) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5800X) — the EPYC 9355P offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9355P) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 5800X).
| Feature | EPYC 9355P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+4700% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9355P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). Primary use case: EPYC 9355P targets Data Center / Single Socket, Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 9355P rivals Xeon 6740P.
| Feature | EPYC 9355P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Data Center / Single Socket | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9355P launched at $2998 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5800X debuted at $449. On MSRP ($2998 vs $449), the Ryzen 7 5800X is $2549 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9355P delivers 32.4 pts/$ vs 61.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5800X — making the Ryzen 7 5800X the 62.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9355P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2998 | $449-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.4 | 61.7+90% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












