PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7662

2020

Why buy it

✅+160.9% higher PassMark.
✅+700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($6,150 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
❌114.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 105W.

Ryzen 7 5800X

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $5,701 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 425.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 225W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 72,298).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7662, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 7662

2020

Ryzen 7 5800X

2020

Why buy it

✅+160.9% higher PassMark.
✅+700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $5,701 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 425.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $6,150 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 225W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($6,150 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
❌114.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 105W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 72,298).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7662, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than EPYC 7662?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 7662 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 5800X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7662 is the better fit. You are getting 160.9% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 5800X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 5800X is $5,701 cheaper on MSRP at $449 MSRP versus $6,150 MSRP, and it gives you a 19.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 7662 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 160.9% better PassMark. It is also 425.0% better value on MSRP (61.7 vs 11.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 5800X is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more overall headroom and a better platform outlook.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7662 Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 5800X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7662	Ryzen 7 5800X
1080p
low	192 FPS	206 FPS
medium	156 FPS	178 FPS
high	125 FPS	146 FPS
ultra	97 FPS	110 FPS
1440p
low	156 FPS	170 FPS
medium	122 FPS	142 FPS
high	94 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	75 FPS	88 FPS
4K
low	73 FPS	83 FPS
medium	60 FPS	74 FPS
high	47 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	46 FPS

Open EPYC 7662 Open Ryzen 7 5800X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7662	Ryzen 7 5800X
1080p
low	249 FPS	662 FPS
medium	220 FPS	558 FPS
high	182 FPS	466 FPS
ultra	145 FPS	417 FPS
1440p
low	204 FPS	563 FPS
medium	185 FPS	493 FPS
high	158 FPS	423 FPS
ultra	122 FPS	361 FPS
4K
low	127 FPS	350 FPS
medium	117 FPS	308 FPS
high	102 FPS	288 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	250 FPS

Open EPYC 7662 Open Ryzen 7 5800X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7662	Ryzen 7 5800X
1080p
low	722 FPS	693 FPS
medium	590 FPS	651 FPS
high	513 FPS	570 FPS
ultra	446 FPS	464 FPS
1440p
low	587 FPS	693 FPS
medium	486 FPS	573 FPS
high	423 FPS	498 FPS
ultra	368 FPS	413 FPS
4K
low	426 FPS	484 FPS
medium	330 FPS	410 FPS
high	281 FPS	363 FPS
ultra	227 FPS	302 FPS

Open EPYC 7662 Open Ryzen 7 5800X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7662	Ryzen 7 5800X
1080p
low	935 FPS	693 FPS
medium	846 FPS	693 FPS
high	724 FPS	693 FPS
ultra	624 FPS	693 FPS
1440p
low	721 FPS	693 FPS
medium	628 FPS	693 FPS
high	535 FPS	672 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	593 FPS
4K
low	514 FPS	604 FPS
medium	458 FPS	550 FPS
high	400 FPS	495 FPS
ultra	348 FPS	436 FPS

Open EPYC 7662 Open Ryzen 7 5800X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 7 5800X

EPYC 7662

The EPYC 7662 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-02-19. It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 32 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 72,298 points. Launch price was $6,700.

Ryzen 7 5800X

The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7662 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7662 has 56 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7662 versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 35% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X (base: 2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 7662 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7662 scores 72,298 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 89.2% lead for the EPYC 7662. L3 cache: 256 MB on the EPYC 7662 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.

Feature	EPYC 7662	Ryzen 7 5800X
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+700%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	4.7 GHz+42%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.8 GHz+90%
L3 Cache	256 MB+700%	32 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+6300%	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
PassMark	72,298+161%	27,712

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7662 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7662 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5800X — the EPYC 7662 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7662 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7662) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 5800X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7662) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5800X) — the EPYC 7662 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7662) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 5800X).

Feature	EPYC 7662	Ryzen 7 5800X
Socket	SP3	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200+79900%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	128 GB+3276700%
RAM Channels	8+300%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+433%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 5800X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7662) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 7662 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280.

Feature	EPYC 7662	Ryzen 7 5800X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7662 launched at $6150 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5800X debuted at $449. On MSRP ($6150 vs $449), the Ryzen 7 5800X is $5701 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7662 delivers 11.8 pts/$ vs 61.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5800X — making the Ryzen 7 5800X the 136% better value option.