
EPYC 7401P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7401P
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌47.6% higher power demand at 155W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +40.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 155W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 27,836).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7401P, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while EPYC 7401P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
EPYC 7401P
2017Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +40.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 155W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌47.6% higher power demand at 155W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 27,836).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7401P, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while EPYC 7401P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than EPYC 7401P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7401P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7401P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 563 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 250 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7401P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 620 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 399 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 517 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 325 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7401P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 696 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 696 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 651 FPS | 693 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 666 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 584 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 420 FPS | 593 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 320 FPS | 436 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7401P and Ryzen 7 5800X

EPYC 7401P
EPYC 7401P
The EPYC 7401P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,836 points. Launch price was $1,075.


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7401P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7401P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7401P versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 44.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X (base: 2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 7401P uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7401P scores 27,836 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 0.4% lead for the EPYC 7401P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7401P vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | EPYC 7401P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+200% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.7 GHz+57% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.8 GHz+90% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+100% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Naples (2017−2018) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 27,836 | 27,712 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7401P uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | EPYC 7401P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 7401P) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop.
| Feature | EPYC 7401P | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












