
EPYC 7351
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7351
2017Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,226 vs 27,712).
- ❌47.6% higher power demand at 155W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 155W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7351, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while EPYC 7351 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
EPYC 7351
2017Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 155W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,226 vs 27,712).
- ❌47.6% higher power demand at 155W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7351, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while EPYC 7351 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than EPYC 7351?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7351 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7351 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 271 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 305 FPS | 563 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 250 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7351 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 581 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 513 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 462 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 513 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 381 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 305 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7351 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 581 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 581 FPS | 693 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 581 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 504 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 593 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 436 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7351 and Ryzen 7 5800X

EPYC 7351
EPYC 7351
The EPYC 7351 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 23,226 points. Launch price was $1,100.


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7351 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7351 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the EPYC 7351 versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 47.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 7351 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7351 scores 23,226 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 17.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7351 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | EPYC 7351 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz | 4.7 GHz+62% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz+58% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+100% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Naples (2017−2018) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 23,226 | 27,712+19% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7351 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | EPYC 7351 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 7351) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop.
| Feature | EPYC 7351 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












