
EPYC 7302
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7302
2019Why buy it
- ✅+20.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.3 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($978 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌47.6% higher power demand at 155W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $529 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $978 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 80.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 34.3 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $978 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 155W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 33,499).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7302, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 7302
2019Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+20.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $529 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $978 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 80.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 34.3 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $978 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 155W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.3 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($978 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌47.6% higher power demand at 155W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 33,499).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7302, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than EPYC 7302?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7302 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7302 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 302 FPS | 563 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 250 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7302 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 642 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 523 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 409 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 285 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7302 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 821 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 745 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 646 FPS | 693 FPS |
| ultra | 567 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 657 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 572 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 492 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 593 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 449 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 402 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 359 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 436 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7302 and Ryzen 7 5800X

EPYC 7302
EPYC 7302
The EPYC 7302 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 33,499 points. Launch price was $978.


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7302 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7302 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7302 versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 35% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X (base: 3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 7302 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7302 scores 33,499 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 18.9% lead for the EPYC 7302. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7302 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | EPYC 7302 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 4.7 GHz+42% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.8 GHz+27% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 33,499+21% | 27,712 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 19,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,192 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,254 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7302 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7302 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7302) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 5800X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7302) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5800X) — the EPYC 7302 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80,SP3 (EPYC 7302) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 5800X).
| Feature | EPYC 7302 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+3100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 5800X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7302) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). Primary use case: EPYC 7302 targets Server / Multi-thread Workstation, Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 7302 rivals Xeon Gold 6230.
| Feature | EPYC 7302 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Server / Multi-thread Workstation | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7302 launched at $978 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5800X debuted at $449. On MSRP ($978 vs $449), the Ryzen 7 5800X is $529 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7302 delivers 34.3 pts/$ vs 61.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5800X — making the Ryzen 7 5800X the 57.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7302 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $978 | $449-54% |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.3 | 61.7+80% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












