
EPYC 72F3
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 72F3
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,252 vs 27,712).
- ❌71.4% higher power demand at 180W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 180W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 72F3 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while EPYC 72F3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
EPYC 72F3
2021Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 180W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,252 vs 27,712).
- ❌71.4% higher power demand at 180W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 72F3 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while EPYC 72F3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than EPYC 72F3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 72F3 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 231 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 72F3 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 583 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 510 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 412 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 563 FPS |
| medium | 436 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 362 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 304 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 245 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 250 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 72F3 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 681 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 681 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 681 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 681 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 681 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 597 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 534 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 466 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 72F3 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 681 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 681 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 681 FPS | 693 FPS |
| ultra | 681 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 681 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 681 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 655 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 565 FPS | 593 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 643 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 574 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 499 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 436 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 72F3 and Ryzen 7 5800X

EPYC 72F3
EPYC 72F3
The EPYC 72F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,252 points. Launch price was $2,468.


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 72F3 and Ryzen 7 5800X share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 72F3 versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 13.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 72F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 72F3 scores 27,252 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 1.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 72F3 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | EPYC 72F3 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz | 4.7 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.8 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+700% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 27,252 | 27,712+2% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 72F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | EPYC 72F3 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 72F3) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop.
| Feature | EPYC 72F3 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












