
Core i9-9980HK
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-9980HK
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 105W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,966 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Core i9-9980HK mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 45W.
Core i9-9980HK
2019Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 105W, a 60W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,966 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Core i9-9980HK mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than Core i9-9980HK?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-9980HK | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-9980HK | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 349 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 563 FPS |
| medium | 349 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 250 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-9980HK | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 349 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 349 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 349 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-9980HK | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 349 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 693 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 349 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 593 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 349 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 436 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-9980HK and Ryzen 7 5800X

Core i9-9980HK
Core i9-9980HK
The Core i9-9980HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,966 points. Launch price was $583.


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
Both the Core i9-9980HK and Ryzen 7 5800X share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-9980HK versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 6.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-9980HK (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i9-9980HK uses the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9980HK scores 13,966 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 66% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-9980HK vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | Core i9-9980HK | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+6% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz+58% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 32 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-HR (2019) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 13,966 | 27,712+98% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-9980HK uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-9980HK | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-9980HK) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i9-9980HK | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











